Why against multipolarity despite many socialist state arise after ww1 and even more after ww2 end? I ask this question because I see many people in r/communism view multipolarity negatively.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hah they seethed so hard the r/communism and r/communism101 maoist mods carpet banned everyone who had r/genzedong in their posting history.

      • Łumało [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Haha I remember that vividly, what a day 🥰

        One of the few occasions to celebrate on 9/11 lmao

    • nephs
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s the issue with maoism?

      Didn’t they get some revolution to happen and get the benefit (or at least a large part of it) to the working class?

      • darkcalling
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Maoists have never had a successful revolution and have never really won lasting gains for the working class.

        Now when I say Maoists as in Maoist Ultras I am talking about Gonzalo thought or MLM (Marxism-Leninism-Maoism) as they call themselves usually. I am not talking about ML-MZT or Marxist-Leninist with Mao-Zedong-Thought.

        Mao adapted ML thought to China’s unique conditions and succeeded. The communist party he helped found (CPC) is now the leading socialist nation and the largest in pure numbers of membership as well as the one of the only ones actively advancing theory (Cuba is also doing some things but smaller given their circumstances). MLM’s condemn modern China for not being pure enough. They are a left deviation, the same kind Mao wrote against and condemned at various points. On the other hand they celebrate, venerate and support a deranged man (Gonzalo) who died in prison without leading a successful revolution or doing anything but founding a group of theoretically unsound guerillas who turned to adventurism and violence over substance.

        Too many of these MLM’s seek glory and adventure instead of service. Of course those in the west would scream and run away at the prospect of having to commit violence themselves but through their purity fetishism they get to condemn all existing communist movements and all capitalists states and put themselves above it all as some imaginary, idealist, superior system. In that way they serve capital and empire. These people have a martyr complex and a martyr worship complex. It is in that way not surprising how attractive they are in the soup of western Christian civilization and thought, such ideas being promulgated as very honorable, attractive, etc in keeping with such philosophies.

        • rngzz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They sound a lots like Donglin party at the end of Ming Dynasty.

        • nephs
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thank you! Mapping the names of variant ideas is so hard! Often counterintuitive since branches want to claim the big names for them.

          Funnily enough, Marx, Lenin, Stalin and Mao apparently didn’t really want their names appended to the ideas.

          In that space, how did ML came to be named that? Was it Lenin’s huge body of work and early death to fault?

        • MILFCortana
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is there like mlm theory? What’s their most popular book?