• Weyland
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    To be fair, going by Wikipedia standards a lot of those claims would need sources regardless.

    Also, I forgot my Twitter password and I’m not signing in ha

    • CriticalResist8OPA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      If you mean on the page I agree some of the wording could be made a little bit more accurate, but everything is sourced (albeit at the end of long sentences). An editor actually went through some of it to clarify the sentences that could be clarified. For us it’s definitely an exercise in understanding why it’s important to be accurate and not let personal bias, but with that said (just in case MWM sees this or whatever lol) we still stand by what was and is written. The clarifications removed words like “often [called for collaboration]” since we only have one source for it. If we got another source for it we would be able to bring back the word often. So mostly small stuff.