Lugansk: 100%
Kherson: 94.3%
Zaporozhye: 72.49%
Donetsk: 60.29%
Kharkiv: 33.15%
Nikolaevskaya: 4.83%

Source

  • @Kirbywithwhip1987
    link
    62 years ago

    I always wondered why do they show ‘‘mercy’’ on Ukraine, didn’t they already crossed every line for that? Until that point, Kiev was very close to being 100% surrounded from all sides and to fall, it would be over until now if they continued, wonder if northern front will be started again soon.

    Also, so now the goal is eliminating Ukraine as a state, I thought it will just be annexing half of it and change the government in what’s left of it in western part.

    • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
      link
      10
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      First, taking such big of a city is not easy. You either siege it, waiting for surrender, causing incredible atrocity for civilian population or take it in a street fight which basically means widespread destruction and even more atrocities.

      Not to mention Russia never wanted to take Kiev back then, just a single look at engaged forces would tell you this - it was strategic feint to divert Ukrainian army - don’t forget Ukraine have constant numerical advantage, and early in the war it was even more, and they did not lost most of the equipment back then.

      • @Kirbywithwhip1987
        link
        52 years ago

        How long do you predict war lasting, is it realistic to end next year, spring or summer maybe?

        • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
          link
          12
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          No idea, i was wrong about the war starting in the first place. I guess by now it is foremost political, than economical and only on the last place a military conflict. USA and their vassal EU declared a total economical warfare against Russia - they pulled out from nothing. But they made a mistake with military part, as it is the strongest side of modern Russia - and after some pondering i think that’s exactly why that war started - because Russians calculated this is how they have most chance. Of course it was incredibly risky, if less countries ignored the US sanctions, Russia would be fucked quickly. But the risk was apparently well calculated and it is currently paying off - USA and EU are steadily bleeding their economy and their military resources in this war way faster than Russia (without even directly participating!), and this in one of the major reasons why Russia is going so slow - they don’t really have any other means to weaken the west. And their target is actually the same as USA - it was never war for Ukraine, nobody give a shit about that, it was a war for Europe, either Europe remain as US vassals and spiral down to being huge Puerto Rico, or they break off and finally start to do what EU was theoretically created for, or the EU shatters.

          So i would carefullty say that this war will probably last till either EU breaks or Ukraine surrenders.

          • @CriticalResist8A
            link
            12
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The ruble is stronger than it’s been in a decade so they might have calculated the risk. At the very least I can believe they expected this to happen.

            (this graph doesn’t show the 2000s where the ruble was steadily stronger. This graph compares roubles to the Euro)

            • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
              link
              8
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Yeah, it is obvious they did not moved before having guarantees from China. Possibly also from India and other trade partners.

            • @crossy_grynch
              link
              42 years ago

              HAHAHAHAHA. Ruble is weak because Russian government kept it weak because it makes labor cheap which is very good for oligarchs. For years they’ve been buying euros and dollars to keep ruble low, and you know what happened to those money? Those are the money that got frozen! Poof! Today they do everything they can to prevent ruble to become even stronger.

          • @crossy_grynch
            link
            22 years ago

            USA is not bleeding economy. Moreover, they suck blood from bleeding EU by supplying very, very overpriced LNG. And it’s not even winter yet!

            • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
              link
              132 years ago

              Oh but they are, just slower than Europe, but this looting isn’t sustainable and they will bleed like a pig when the petrodollar ends, which is real perspective.

            • JucheBot1988
              link
              92 years ago

              Speaking from the US, the economy is definitely hurting. Our government tries to project an image of strength abroad, but at home we’re told things like “you need to suffer for Ukraine, your pain is worth it to punish Russia.”

        • @CriticalResist8A
          link
          112 years ago

          Only thing I can tell you is when they say the war will be over quickly, it never is. Never has been.

        • @crossy_grynch
          link
          62 years ago

          The most possible prediction I heard is this: “Taking whole Ukraine will take as much as taking Donetsk and Lugansk”. We aren’t even half there.

    • @crossy_grynch
      link
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The problem is if only half of Ukraine is taken, the other half will be turned into a terrorist kamikaze state by NATO with sole reason of existence is to hurt anything Russian. Yes, even worse than now, it will be literally like ISIS. I don’t know about opening other fronts but Russian forces are severely outnumbered because of special operation format but since for Russia winning is a matter of existence, if thing will go really, really wrong, Putin will announce mobilization. So far Russia is only fighting on territory very close to border where support of locals is high.