☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to World NewsEnglish · 2 years agoPrioritiesimagemessage-square278linkfedilinkarrow-up1315arrow-down164
arrow-up1251arrow-down1imagePriorities☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to World NewsEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square278linkfedilink
minus-squareShinhoshilinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 years agoThat’s because almost anywhere being annexed by the DPRK is an improvement.
minus-squareComradeSaladlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoI don’t know, I feel like that would be a logistical and administrative nightmare, especially as the population of Texas is 5 million more then North Korea, and not that many Texans speak Korean while an equally few North Koreans speak English.
minus-squareShinhoshilinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoIt would still be better than the current administration.
minus-squareredtealinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoTbf you could probably drum up a lot of support for the DPRK in Texas by offering Texans the right to personal nukes, courtesy of Kim.
minus-squareShinhoshilinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoSure, but on the other hand, this is Texas we’re talking about. It would turn into nuclear winter real fast…
That’s because almost anywhere being annexed by the DPRK is an improvement.
I don’t know, I feel like that would be a logistical and administrative nightmare, especially as the population of Texas is 5 million more then North Korea, and not that many Texans speak Korean while an equally few North Koreans speak English.
It would still be better than the current administration.
Tbf you could probably drum up a lot of support for the DPRK in Texas by offering Texans the right to personal nukes, courtesy of Kim.
Sure, but on the other hand, this is Texas we’re talking about. It would turn into nuclear winter real fast…