☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to World NewsEnglish · 1 year agoPrioritiesimagemessage-square280fedilinkarrow-up1312arrow-down164
arrow-up1248arrow-down1imagePriorities☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to World NewsEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square280fedilink
minus-square🏳️⚧️ 新星 [she/they]linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·edit-21 year agoThat’s because almost anywhere being annexed by the DPRK is an improvement.
minus-squareComradeSaladlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoI don’t know, I feel like that would be a logistical and administrative nightmare, especially as the population of Texas is 5 million more then North Korea, and not that many Texans speak Korean while an equally few North Koreans speak English.
minus-square🏳️⚧️ 新星 [she/they]linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoIt would still be better than the current administration.
minus-squareredtealinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoTbf you could probably drum up a lot of support for the DPRK in Texas by offering Texans the right to personal nukes, courtesy of Kim.
minus-square🏳️⚧️ 新星 [she/they]linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoSure, but on the other hand, this is Texas we’re talking about. It would turn into nuclear winter real fast…
That’s because almost anywhere being annexed by the DPRK is an improvement.
I don’t know, I feel like that would be a logistical and administrative nightmare, especially as the population of Texas is 5 million more then North Korea, and not that many Texans speak Korean while an equally few North Koreans speak English.
It would still be better than the current administration.
Tbf you could probably drum up a lot of support for the DPRK in Texas by offering Texans the right to personal nukes, courtesy of Kim.
Sure, but on the other hand, this is Texas we’re talking about. It would turn into nuclear winter real fast…