• @Shrike502
    link
    112 years ago

    Doesn’t that surplus also get sold to civvies? Or did they clamp down on that?

    • @Ottar
      link
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • @bleepingblorp
        link
        82 years ago

        Well, on the bright side those same military grade assault rifles available to Joe Norm is also available to us.

        • @Ottar
          link
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • @bleepingblorp
            link
            132 years ago

            So were the US military personnel in Afghanistan.

            If we need to engage the US police in armed conflict in our lifetimes, it is good to utilize asymmetric warfare strategy. Asymmetric warfare is is the type of war conducted against an opponent who vastly overpowers you in technology, resources, etc.

            If the enemy goes high tech, you go low tech. If the enemy advances, you withdraw. If the enemy occupies, you harass. If the enemy is monitoring cell phones, don’t use cell phones.

            Sure, the police might be suited up in $35k of weapons and armor, but you can nullify all of that with a $25 pipe bomb. Also not all police are armed like that all the time. Some good first targets in a violent revolution would be some small town municipal centers, you know, the kinds of towns with only a few thousand people and they just combine the police department with some bureaucrat building. A town of 2k people might only have 4 or 5 pigs on payroll, and not all of them will be working at the same time. A bomb and a quick 3-5 minute or less post boom raid can cripple that town’s ability to deploy pigs and also might gain you some weapons and armor for the comrades. Then scatter and let nearby cities and sheriff departments waste resources sending a bunch of people. When the enemy occupies, you harass. When the enemy advances, you withdraw.