• redtea
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does that support ComradeSalad’s point? I.e. because if they were meant to last longer, they’d have been built differently?

    • Shrike502
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes and no. They would have been built different, but not from wood. Don’t have to go far for examples either: here’s a house that was built to last in Stalin period. ComradeSalad does raise valid points regarding temperature jumps and the need for upkeep - but the latter is an issue with the economic mode, not the materials.

      Besides, it’s the XXI century. Surely we can build things with materials a tiny bit more advanced than basic concrete