The Ministry of Justice of the Donetsk Peoples Republic just announced that the death penalty will be on the table as a punishment for the nazis and mercenaries that will soon be put on trial for their crimes against the people of Donbass. The trial will begin soon. The nazis are being charged with crimes against humanity, genocide and mercenarism (all punishable up to the death penalty). There are 2 british citizens among them. Nazis be shitting their pants, libs be coping 🤣🤣🤣👌👌👌👌

  • I think they know, but they probably believe that they’re controlled by Russia (i.e. the Almighty Dictator Puut’n™, not the ethnic Russians who actually live there), just like they seem to believe that the referendum in Crimea was manipulated by Russia

        • ButtigiegMineralMap
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Please give us 2$ so we can continue spreading rampant misinformation. For 7$, we’ll continue to circulate heavily biased truthful info that doesn’t show both sides for at least 2 more days before we ask again

        • SaddamHussein24OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Wikipedia is literally controlled by the US government (possibly CIA). The Grayzone did 2 articles about it. The Chairman of the Wikimedia Foundation (head of wikipedia) gets tons of money from the NED and worked herself in the past in NGOs that “promote democracy” in the Middle East. All of this right before the Arab Spring, quite the coincidence. Some speculate due to this that she works for the CIA. Also the founder of Wikipedia is an anticommunist Ayn Rand stan.

            • SaddamHussein24OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Oh yeah Wikipedia is still great, has a lot of info on many things. But on political topics it has insane prowest bias, you have to be very skeptical of what they say. They literally consider Radio Free Asia a reliable source while CGTN is banned as “harmful propaganda”. Even WikiLeaks is considered “russian propaganda” by Wikipedia!

              • xxcvzvcxx
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                lol even after all that Wikipedia still has better articles than any other western outlet. For instance when Ukraine stans tried to remove mentions of Nazism in the Azov Battalion article, it was repeatedly restored by wikipedia editors and then it was locked. Btw while wikipedia does have their biases in source selection nevertheless a lot is still left to individual editors, so if you have the time and patience being a wikipedia editor is a good way or distributing knowledge albeit limited and with good wikipedia editors it can be a good gateway to better sources. Even just reverting vandalism done by Nazis does have an effect.

                • SaddamHussein24OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I mean still, considering Radio Free Asia, a literal CIA propaganda outlet, as “reliable” while WikiLeaks, a truthful media that has exposed numerous western crimes, is “propaganda” and cant be cited, is very sus.