Still can’t get my damn my mind around the “fact” that this shit is disputed

Quick update: the discussion page is even worse, libs try to completely remove the Neo Nazi part of it and label this as “russian propaganda”, it already worked in the German version of the article and you can’t even change it back, to protect the page from “vandalism”

  • @CosmonautCat
    link
    362 years ago

    At this point I feel that the entire unit can line up and do the nazi salute on camera and some twitter checkmarks will start explaining how they’re actually just reclaiming the historical roman salute and it’s not in any way related to neo-nazism.

    • @Shrike502
      link
      162 years ago

      will start explaining how they’re actually just reclaiming the historical roman salute

      You’re giving me flashbacks to watching some “Russian nationalist” on TV explain how his org’s salute was totally not a sieg heil, you guys! Quote: “The palm goes from the chest and upwards - from the heart to God!”

      • @PolandIsAStateOfMind
        link
        72 years ago

        One judge in Poland actually really said in the sentence that the sieg heiling of archetypical skinhead neonazi was “roman salute” and therefore ok.

    • @Eat_Yo_Vegetables69
      link
      16
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      At the same time they’ll claim the use of swastikas and other symbols “aren’t fascist, those symbols were co-opted by the nazis!!11”

      • @CosmonautCat
        link
        102 years ago

        They are simply enthusiastic about historical symbols. The fact that all the symbols they are using just happen to have also used by the nazis is merely a crazy coincidence and does not mean that wholesome Azov are nazis.