Their response to the fact that NATO extension was an element that provoked the invasion is to point out that… there is an invasion

Like literally that’s what they say, we say NATO played a role in Russia invading Ukraine and their argument against that is just “yet it’s Russia who’s invading” like yes we knew, there is literally no argument

And you know the worst thing about this is that it works, I was actually confused by the argument and I had a hard time addressing it because the best way of sounding right is to be actually illogical enough to prevent a logical response from being made