• @cfgaussian
    link
    142 years ago

    “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” is an argument that can also be used to justify being pro-Russia in this case, unless that is you don’t really consider Nazis your enemies…and that’s the crux of the matter. libs don’t really oppose nazis, they embrace them when they need to use them against their real enemies.

    i for one will always stand on the side that is killing nazis. can’t go wrong with that.

    • JucheBot1988
      link
      102 years ago

      The more I deal with right-wing Zionists, the more I get the feeling that they actually have a weird love-hate relationship with Hitler. As in, “Yeah, he tried to exterminate my people, but he got everything else so, so right!”

      • @supersolid_snake
        link
        102 years ago

        Zionists tried to provide apartheid south africa nukes with the understanding that there are inferior races, they just aren’t Jews. That’s the Zionist mindset.

      • @xxcvzvcxx
        link
        82 years ago

        Zionist mindset is might makes right, and had been for a decade before Hitler had even become relevant. To a Zionist the only bad thing Hitler did was not being a Jew. Their worldview is a battle of races where the Jews are the superior race and it is their god given duty to become mightier than non-Jews and exert your will upon them, which is what Hitler was doing.

        This is not merely my opinion btw. Revisionist Zionism is the main movement that established Israel through terrorism and also the main political movement in modern day Israel through their political and military arms Likud and IDF. The wikipedia article on Revisionist Zionism has an entire section on “Fascist views within the movement”, which includes:

        When Ahimeir was put on trial in 1932 for having disrupted a public lecture at Hebrew University, his lawyer, Zvi Eliahu Cohen, argued “Were it not for Hitler’s anti-Semitism, we would not oppose his ideology. Hitler saved Germany.” Tom Segev has remarked, “This was not an unconsidered outburst.” An editorial in the Revisionist newspaper Hazit Haam praised Cohen’s “brilliant speech.” It continued, that “Social Democrats of all stripes believe that Hitler’s movement is an empty shell (but) we believe that there is both a shell and a kernel. The anti-Semitic shell is to be discarded, but not the anti-Marxist kernel. The Revisionists would fight the Nazis only to the extent that they were anti-Semites.”[22]

        In 1933, when Hitler came to power, the newspaper, whose editors were Revisionist Party members, praised Nazism as a German national liberation movement and said that Hitler had saved Germany from Communism. Jabotinsky responded by threatening to have the newspaper’s editors expelled if they repeated such “kow-towing” to Hitler.[23]

        These guys were literally praising Hitler and their leader had to shut them up because they were saying the quite parts out loud.