SeeingRed [he/him]

So instead of a straw hat it’s a helmet with a brim? Not only have the coopted a modern day epic about revolutionary liberation and tearing down oppression, but they can’t even get the symbolism correct. It’s truly sad. I see some people being excited about this as a wave of revolutions, but i haven’t been able to dig in enough to understand how many of these are just attempts at colour revolution.

I’ve only visited China, and my chinese freinds haven’t talked about this issue before, so all my experience is from the chinese internet. I would be interested in a more in depth analysis if it exists.

I’ve only seen one person on Rednote talking about trans issues openly, and they were careful to make their content primarily in English. They claimed that making the content in chinese would get them more online harrassment which they didn’t want to deal with. It’s not that everyone is a problem, but there are enough of them to make it very unpleasant. While transition can be legally done, requiring surgery as others have pointed out, it is still difficult socially.

This same creator had one video where they pointed out that younger people are generally more accepting, but not universally so, and older generations are rarely understanding or accepting. That being said, they do make it clear that the culture is shifting, it’s just going to take time.

Regarding same sex couples, it’s a mixed bag as well. The media has to skirt around explicit relationships much of the time, but will include very heavily coded characters. There was the legal case a year or so back regarding the rights of same sexual couples as it relates to their children. There was a post here on lemmygrad about this a while back. The relationship was not considered legally relevant in that case, but they did rule in favour of the children being of both parents because one acted as a surrogate. There’s some hope there, but it’s a long, long way to go.

I’m hopeful that we’ll see things change in the next few decades as in Vietnam and Cuba, but that’s just vibes. It could be better, but it’s certainly not the worst in the world.

another non-solution to the affordability crisis? Colour me shocked

Profit over functionality aside, one thing that can make Google slightly more tolerable is to switch it into “web search” mode. This strips away all the AI crap, sponsored links, etc. apparently there are ways you can set it to be the default. I find I use Google less and less anyway, but it’s a good option when the first page is useless garbage.

The number of times the Google AI summary has either outright lied or given me some horrible hallucinated approximation of an answer is disgusting. Asking it anything remotely complicated, technical, or uncommonly searched gives the most egregious results. It’s to the point that I question anything it says, which means it’s truely useless. At best, I read a few lines, see if the information seems relevant, then I click on its source links, often to find that the information stated just isn’t at those links.

I appreciate the line that states most of their business is not affected because Europe and the middle east still buy a lot of stuff. America realizing they don’t matter anymore is fun to watch.

Over the last few weeks I’ve been playing Microtopia which is a game about ants that are microprocessors/mechanical. It is a factory simulator, but the base components are the ants and production buildings.

The ants have a lifespan, so you are managing them as a resources that is also required to make more of themselves. And there are not any belts or inserters as in most games, but instead the ants act as the logistics system, the resource gathering system, and the productive system.

It’s a slightly fresh take on the genre, and it was fun to learn the novel systems. However, it really could use some QOL and some options for lower graphics settings.

These sorts of games are fun for me because they allow me to solve small problems that slowly lead to complex systems. I really enjoy the feeling of accomplishment from building something complex like this.

I’m in a similar boat. I ended up getting rid of my car and a bunch of other expenses that were not bringing me joy and were a drain on me. As a result, I’ve been able to save a lot as a bulwark against the need to constantly perform. It doesn’t help though, because I still need to go to a place I don’t want to be for too many hours per day. It’s not like I could survive indefinitely if I stop working.

I would like to have a kid, but can’t afford to. My wife also is trying to get her career off the ground and so we are not really in the best position. I’m well off enough for our current life, but if we move to a bigger space and have to start paying for all that is required, the math doesn’t math anymore.

Maybe in a few years we’ll reconsider before we are too old

It really is like this. I have a friend who’s family grew up in the Soviet Union, and left during the collapse (he was born after). He is vehemently against Communism, but he’s also strongly against capitalism. It’s a bit frustrating to talk with him because he’ll agree with me right up until I start to talk strategy or historical context around the Soviet Union.

I always find it silly how humanoid robots almost never turn in a way that looks easy. They do a small shuffle and it takes multiple steps to turn 90 degrees.

I guessing that it’s not a trivial problem to solve. Or maybe there are hardware limitations that don’t allow human like movements. Like, maybe the hip and leg sockets are not able to make certain motions. Otherwise, it’s something that could easily be solved through reinforcement learning. Maybe it’s just never been a priority either.

I know that from an economic perspective, having a robot that can do a human task slowly but for less than it takes to hire a human for a proportional amount of time makes sense. And if we want to reduce mundane human working hours under socialism, it makes sense to build these sorts of robots. Especially as their abilities increase (more dexterity, better sensors, better software, etc.). Right now they feel super gimicky, but I can see the potential.

That bit at the end where the one bot charged the other bot was kind of cute.

What is this even supposed to mean!? I guess the reader needs to only see Russia as some mythologized evil to make that sentence make sense with the rest of the article.

I definitely get that. I was somehow able to get through it because it was what I was focused on at the time, and it still took me a while.

It really is worth reading. To make it easier, I suggest a reading group, or a reading companion podcast, or the audio version.

This has truely been a wonderful thing to see. I do wonder about what actions will be taken by the west in response to this.

At least 小红书 seems to be in the position that they want to allow the western users to keep using their platform non-region locked.

Does Germany have centrifuges to refine uranium for power plants still? They may be refining and selling to other countries. This could be a response to the recent reduction in natural gas supply from Russia.

This could be for bombs, but it could also just be capital taking advantage of new conditions.

I’m the same way, and have a friend with a good memory. Every time we meet up he talks about all the DnD games we played and different things we had done in the past and I only really remember, like, half of it.

I’ve kept journals in the past, but I rarely stick to it. It’s interesting to return to those after a while.

That’s true, on a non human timescale the progress is nearly impossible to predict, especially with novel technology. For example, when space travel was an early concept, we thought travelling the stars was a forgone conclusion. We now know that any exploration in that front will be locked behind either breakthrough science or will be limited to slow generation ships, or robotic exploration.

That a technology capable of producing human level intelligence, or beyond does feel like a certainty since there is no reason to believe that the process of intelligent thought is limited to a biological substrate. We haven’t discovered any fundamental physical laws that stop us from doing this yet. Key issues to solve beyond the hardware problem come into effect with alignment, understanding the key fundamentals of consciousness and intelligence, understanding different types of minds beyond those of humans, and better understandings of emergent phenomena. But these areas will be explored in sufficient detail to yield an answer within time.

I will have to read these other books, I’m definitely interested in picking up some more good books.

We definitely have a series of breakthroughs needed before I can see any possibility of human consciousness uploads, to say nothing of the resources required to simulate that intelligence. Any simulation of intelligence requires resources, it may be plausible that we can bring the resources required below the resources for keeping a human alive. That being said, I’m not sure it’s the only logical progression of technology.

I’m partial to the concept of artificial realities presented in the “Culture” book series.

In that series, the biological population in the “Culture society” is well educated, truly free and provided anything they could want by purpose built extremely compassionate AI. Then simulated world’s are primarily an afterlife or an alternative to the physical world.

They also had artificial intelligence and uploaded biological intelligence interact with the physical world through robotic presences.

There were some interesting concepts that came out of that, like highly religious societies producing horrific “Hell” afterlife when they realized that metaphysical afterlifes were not experimentally verifiable.

I had issues with some of the takes of the author, but it was an interesting read.

Oh nice! I wouldn’t mind a re-read of it before jumping into volume 2. Especially if the language is easier to follow. Even just a re-read of some key chapters.

It’s so frustrating to read anything about IMF loans because most summaries are all euphemistic economic jargon. Then you read past the summary and while the material is still opaque, they’ll have snippets where they explain in plain language what they want.

I assume this is an attempt to re-shore manufacturing, especially if as many of us expect, many countries choose to take the tarrif hit so that they can keep trading in their own currency between eachother.

It’s a strategic bet, bring home some manufacturing while hurting those who defy the empire. It’ll certainly reduce the availability of certain goods in the US as countries choose other markets. This likely would help to encourage some level of reshoring, or at least increase pressure from the ruling class to force more coups of other countries to force them back onto the dollar system.

Whether this will backfire or not will is something that is very hard to predict.