I’ve been compiling a shitlist on RBG, here’s what I got so far.
Ruth Bader Ginsberg
Much credit to David Kinder’s current affairs article, the rise of the Ruth Bader Ginsburg cult.
Native peoples, immigrants, and treatment of minorities.
- Ruled against the Oneida tribe over a dispute regarding its territorial claim, her majority opinion stating: “We hold that the tribe cannot unilaterally revive its ancient sovereignty, in whole or in part, over the parcels at issue.” 2
- In Navajo Nation v. United States Forest Service, she ruled against the Navajo nation, who have consistently protested US encroachment of a US forest-service run ski resort on Navajo territory known as the sacred San Francisco Peaks.
- A podcast by Red Nation, w/ Rebecca Nagle, on the Supreme court’s Oklahoma Decision.
- Helped push through the Atlantic coast pipeline, to allow it to cross through federal and native lands., 2
- In her final supreme court decision, helped push through Trump’s fast-track deportation bill., 2
- On Black Lives Matter / Colin Kaepernick’s kneeling protest: “I think its dumb and disrespectful, but I wouldn’t lock a person up for doing it.” Later retracted her statement after receiving public backlash.
- RBG hired 1 POC staffer in 25 years. Kavanaugh, a conservative justice, has 25% POC out of his 48 law clerks. One writer noted that Kavanaughs views on affirmative action don’t reflect his diverse hiring practices, while Ginsburg’s progressive views don’t extend to her chambers. This is an improvement from her 13-year tenure on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, when Ginsburg never had any black clerks. When this issue was raised during her Supreme Court confirmation hearings in 1993, Ginsburg said: “If you confirm me for this job, my attractiveness to black candidates is going to improve.” That promise was ignored. 2
- Her best friend on the court was the most racist, conservative justice in modern times, Scalia. In the fawning book Notorious RBG, one of the few mentions of race is in the book’s discussion of Bush v. Gore, the contentious decision that decided the 2000 presidential election. The authors mention that Ginsburg’s draft of her dissent had a footnote alluding to the possible suppression of Black voters in Florida. Justice Scalia responded to this draft by flying into a rage, telling Ginsburg that she was using “Al Sharpton tactics.” Ginsburg removed the footnote before it saw the light of day. This anecdote’s inclusion in the book is baffling, as Ginsburg contemplates calling anti-Black racism in the most facile of ways. But when her friend Justice Scalia plucks an argument straight from right-wing talk radio to shame her out of doing so, Ginsburg instantly capitulates. Scalia called the Voting rights act “racial entitlement”, opposed women’s rights, and consistently defended anti-gay measures, yet these views did not stop her calling Scalia her “best buddy” on the court, their families even spending every new year together.
Law and Order
- In Brogan v United States, ruled that due process does not apply to those being questioned by law enforcement.
- In Kansas v. Carr, the Kansas Supreme Court had overturned a pair of death sentences, on the grounds that the defendants’ Eighth Amendment rights had been violated in the instructions given to the jury. The U.S. Supreme swooped in, informing Kansas that it had made a mistake; nobody’s Eighth Amendment rights had been violated, thus the defendants ought to have continued unimpeded along the path toward execution. The Court’s decision was 8-1, with Ginsburg putting her name on Justice Scalia’s majority opinion.
- In Samson v. California, she went against the other liberal judges, on the issue of whether police could conduct warrantless searches of parolees merely because they were on parole. She sided with the police.
- In Heien v. North Carolina, Ginsburg held that the police may justifiably pull over cars if they believe they are violating the law, even if the police are misunderstanding the law, so long as the mistake was reasonable.
- In Plumhoff v. Rickard, she concurred with the court that held that the family of two men could not sue the police after they had shot and killed them for fleeing a police stop.
- In Taylor v. Barkes, she concurred with the Court that held that the family of a suicidal man who was jailed and then killed himself could not sue the jail for failing to implement anti-suicide measures.
- In Nieves v Bartlett, agreed that cops should be protected from lawsuits as long as they cite probable cause in the original arrest.
- In Scott v. Harris, a high-speed chase involved a motorist being paralyzed after the cop ran his car off the road. Since the motorist had no charges or suspicion, the court was asked to decide whether the chase consititued unreasonable search and seizure, and whether running a car off the road constitutes deadly force that should be liable to lawsuits. Justice John Paul Stevens, the lone dissenter, argued that the videotape evidence was not decisive, as the majority claimed it to be, and that a jury should determine if deadly force was justified. He stated a jury should be used, instead of the case “being decided by a group of elderly appellate judges”
- As a law and order liberal, she consistently stands with police against outspoken Justice Sotomayer.
Others
- A primary reason for her continued support for Roe V. Wade and abortion rights, is to prevent “growth in populations we don’t want too many of.”
- Ruled that temp workers didn’t deserve paid compensation for being required to watch amazon’s anti-theft videos.
- Refused to retire in 2014 at 81 years old: “Tell me who the president could have nominated this spring that you would rather see on the court than me?”
What do liberals like about her though?
I ask this not because I expect her to have some redeeming qualities but out of general curiosity. I saw the reddit front page pic of Americans gathered for a vigil in her memory (pandemic is still pretty bad) which was kinda nauseating. It got me thinking about what kind of cringe liberalism we will have to deal with when Hillary Clinton dies.
the vast majority of americans are completely depoliticized outside of what is fed to them by the establishment itself. people are desperate for any kind of political figurehead that isn’t a complete and utter shitbag; one who is “fighting the good fight.” they aren’t equipped with the ability to find and support actually non-shitbag figureheads - which the liberal machine takes advantage of. it presents the people shitbags as if they weren’t shitbags by contrasting them with even bigger shitbags.
people are desperate to fight against the current tide of Trumpism and so rabidly and blindly support the “good guys” that have been served to them.
the same way a saturday morning cartoon hero is the hero because he’s put on screen opposite the villain. it’s simplistic children’s theater and nothing more. if you ever question why liberals do anything seemingly insane remember that they simply do not exist in reality but rather the drama that has been created for them.
i feel this is poorly and lengthily written but i hope you understand what i’m trying to say
I’m not exactly sure what spurred the authors of that notorious RBG book to write it in the first place… had to be some decision that she wrote i’m guessing. Or maybe it was in the runnup to the 2016 US election to build support for Hillary.
Her one redeeming thing is that she’s pro abortion, although her reasons for that seem pretty wewy ( see pic below ), its still objectively a good thing in a country filled with Christian zealots.
That’s actually pretty yikes. Usually I don’t think much of pro-choice stance because in first world countries, it’s not a revolutionary viewpoint today even in a reactionary country like the USA. But this reads pretty badly. Sounds like it’s completely devoid of feminism though it’s also just an excerpt.
Also she gets portrayed as a cbampion of feminism. This is from a AP news article:
Steinem has ties with CIA. Seems like every mainstream public facing social justice champion these days is a scam artist.
Name one contemporary “feminist leader” who isn’t a spook or a scam - you can’t.
Oh man this thought didn’t need to be in my mind and now it is. Thanks for that :|