• EmoThugInMyPhase [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It is. Despite putting heavy sanctions on their vehicles, solar panels, and high-tech chips, they simultaneously shit their pants over the POSSIBILITY - not something that’s happening yet - that China will leverage with production by counter-sanctioning the west on the same products (and low tech chips) because the consequences are worse for the west than for China.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 month ago

      The problem for US is that it’s already in over its head with what’s happening in Ukraine and Israel. At the end of the day, they don’t have infinite resources. And as more and more countries join BRICS and realign economies away from the west, the less vulnerable they are collectively.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah but destabilisation operations and general meddling are actually quite cheap, and literally peanuts compared to war. They can afford real many of that as we can observe by the sheer number of countries where they meddle strongly enough to be visible, all at the same time, and constantly.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          That only works in countries that are already unstable though. Traditionally, the playbook has been to do sanctions first, create enough discontent, and then leverage it with orgs like NED to create puppet opposition. However, if countries are stable economically, that whole process can’t take root in the first place. Hence why decoupling from the west is so critical.

    • CarmineCatboy2 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      The kind of aggression we are talking about at the moment is american state governments ordering chinese people and companies to sell their assets for pennies on the dollar.

      Yes, Mexico is rather vulnerable. It’s an annex of the US economy. But it is a sovereign nation. There are american boots on the ground in Perú right now, and the coup government still works with China for infrastructure development. At the very least these investments mean China’s export markets are less dependent on the G7. That’s real de-risking.

      • الأرض ستبقى عربية
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Hopefully it won’t continue, and I don’t think it will. Israel, not only for being the US’s lap dog, but also for stoking Sinophobia and supporting Uyghur separatists.

    • HamManBad [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      Developing the forces of production in Saudi Arabia is the best way to create the conditions for the overthrow of the monarchy. I’ll allow it

          • الأرض ستبقى عربية
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Your productive forces are already developed, where is your communist revolution?

            Other Arab countries that have a history of agriculture, craftsmanship and industry are far more likely to have a communist revolution. The GCC countries are very different: socially, politically and materially. We have a history of being merchants and making money through trade since ancient times. The Nabateans were so rich that anyone who could afford a tomb had one carved, not just kings. In fact one of the biggest Nabatean tombs was commissioned by a merchant. Arabs have been proto-capitalists for at least 2000 years. Islam has rules for trade, capital, investments and so on. Getting rich from resource extraction is very new for us, and agriculture and industry practically nonexistent.

            So again, I assume you are from one of the industrialized Western nations, to which I ask, where is your communist revolution? Materially and socially, you are far more ready than us.

            • HamManBad [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I didn’t say it creates the conditions for communist revolution, I said it creates conditions for the overthrow of the monarchy (and other feudal relations). We haven’t had to deal with a monarch here since 1776. Unfortunately you need class consciousness for communism, which is the one thing we’re missing in the States. Or any conscience at all, really

              • الأرض ستبقى عربية
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I would take a monarchy that gives me free stuff over whatever the US has. Got a Master’s degree without a single dollar of debt. We never had feudalism, but we are still very tribal, though not as much as a hundred years ago.

                • Stalins_Spoon
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Unrelated but did the 1969 coup attempt have popular support?

    • الأرض ستبقى عربية
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      What’s wrong with that?

      China is also sending Mandarin teachers to Saudi Arabia. As a Saudi I’m optimistic and glad that we are looking east.