• TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why wouldnt a socialist or communist at least tactifully support a man who was alive during the USSRs soviet era

    He is one of the “seven bankers” employed by Yeltsin to destroy and sell the communist government… He literally has made billions destroying communism.

    The EU is clearly not friendly to communists, half the countries there ban communists from running!

    And who do you think was the person most responsible for Georgia joining the EU?

    • ghost_of_faso2
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      He is one of the “seven bankers” employed by Yeltsin to destroy and sell the communist government… He literally has made billions destroying communism.

      This is greviances from the 90s, im taking the actions as they are now. We can agree Putin, this billionare are likely opportunistic captialist butchers while still seeing this as a move that benefits communists.

      And who do you think was the person most responsible for Georgia joining the EU?

      Im taking the actions as they are now, even if for cynical reasons breaking up the EU further and moving towards a direction that communism is permitted, and of which the most powerfull member of that bloc is a communist country is progressive.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        This is greviances from the 90s, im taking the actions as they are now. We can agree Putin, this billionare are likely opportunistic captialist butchers while still seeing this as a move that benefits communists.

        How? The communist/socialist parties in Georgia are part of the opposition groups opposed to the Georgian dream party.

        I don’t buy into the false dichotomy that anything that seemingly opposes western imperialism is automatically a win for communist. Nothing is as black and white as theory supposes it to be, and we have to be vigilant about empowering the kleptocracy that are so common among political bodies run by the rich.

        breaking up the EU further and moving towards a direction that communism is permitted

        Right, but what makes you think they are actually going to leave the EU? He’s just emulating countries like Hungary, turkey, and India, who are utilizing geopolitical schisms to consolidate authoritarian regimes while staying plugged into the western capital apparatus.

        • ghost_of_faso2
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          Right, but what makes you think they are actually going to leave the EU? He’s just emulating countries like Hungary, turkey, and India, who are utilizing geopolitical schisms to consolidate authoritarian regimes while staying plugged into the western capital apparatus.

          Im not sure, if they do would you eat your hat and support it?

          Do the communists in Hungary support removal from the EU also?

          I don’t buy into the false dichotomy that anything that seemingly opposes western imperialism is automatically a win for communist.

          Breaking up a bloc that was setup to counter communist infulence, is in fact good.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Im not sure, if they do would you eat your hat and support it?

            If ivanishvili has actually changed his stripes and this wasn’t a conservative ploy to establish an authoritarian kleptocracy, I would gladly eat my hat and yours. But that would be as likely as bill gates donating all his money to Linux developers to create open source programming.

            Do the communists in Hungary support removal from the EU also?

            Hard to tell since Orban has basically done all he can to remove opposition parties. I don’t have a problem with nations decoupling from NATO or the EU, what I have a problem with is empowering social and fiscally conservative political parties who claim to want to decouple as a way to consolidate an authoritarian kleptocracy.

            Breaking up a bloc that was setup to counter communist infulence, is in fact good.

            Right, but who has actually broken away from the bloc? Kinda seems like they’re just utilizing that as a scapegoat to consolidate power without ever actually breaking up the bloc.

            • cfgaussianOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              a conservative ploy to establish an authoritarian kleptocracy

              Not sure why you always have to specify “conservative”. Would it be better if it was liberals doing it?

              And “authoritarian kleptocracy”? How much liberal media have you been consuming? They always love using these terms when refering to Russia but they never actually explain why Russia’s capitalism is so much worse than the West’s. Don’t western states have police that they use to crack down on serious dissent? (Have you not been paying attention to the Palestine protests?) Don’t their capitalists bribe the government and steal from the working class?

              This isn’t “authoritarian kleptocracy” (or whatever other newspeak liberal media comes up with next so they don’t have to reveal their orientalism/chauvinism and just say what they mean which is “eastern barbarism”). It’s just capitalism doing what capitalism always does.

              • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Not sure why you always have to specify “conservative”. Would it be better if it was liberals doing it?

                Liberals are conservative, I was speaking about economics.

                How much liberal media have you been consuming? They always love using these terms when refering to Russia but they never actually explain why Russia’s capitalism is so much worse than the West’s.

                It’s just a political term for capitalism but with a more structured hierarchy of distribution and control to a smaller amount of people. I can let you come up with an excuse why it’s not worse.

                Don’t western states have police that they use to crack down on serious dissent? (Have you not been paying attention to the Palestine protests?) Don’t their capitalists bribe the government and steal from the working class?

                I’m not defending “the west”. If it’s bad when america does it, it’s also bad when Russia doesn’t. Not everything has to happen in the vacuum of a false dichotomy.

                This isn’t “authoritarian kleptocracy” (or whatever other newspeak liberal media comes up with next so they don’t have to reveal their orientalism/chauvinism and just say what they mean which is “eastern barbarism”). It’s just capitalism doing what capitalism always does.

                Lol, as an Asian person it’s kinda hilarious that you think Russia is considered an “eastern country”, when they and anyone actually in the east consider them a western nation.

        • cfgaussianOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The communist/socialist parties in Georgia are part of the opposition groups

          So “communists” are aligned with western backed and funded opposition groups? That’s kind of sus don’t you think? I mean come on, it’s gotta raise some red flags for you about what kind of “socialist parties” these are that associate with liberal NGOs and participate in color revolution attempts.

          He’s just emulating countries like Hungary, turkey, and India, who are utilizing geopolitical schisms to consolidate authoritarian regimes

          Again with this word “authoritarian”. Funny how it’s always used against governments the West doesn’t like. It’s a very unserious word used by unserious people.

          Now, the undoubtedly reactionary nature of these governments aside, isn’t it objectively a good thing that they are behaving that way? That they are undermining the western hegemonistic order for their own selfish interests? Hungary for instance has been a real thorn in the side of the pro-Ukraine warmongers in the EU and NATO. As much as i hate Orban, it’s been frankly pretty entertaining to watch. Don’t you want dissent and disunity in the imperialist camp? I certainly do.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            So “communists” are aligned with western backed and funded opposition groups? That’s kind of sus don’t you think? I mean come on, it’s gotta raise some red flags for you about what kind of “socialist parties” these are that associate with liberal NGOs and participate in color revolution attempts.

            Maybe learn about the politics of the state before you make your judgments? The communist party is a small part of the coalition of parties attempting to block the Georgian dream party. I highly doubt they are receiving any help from any foreign NGO, they align themselves with those who do because they understand the threat that ivanishvili poses.

            NGOs and participate in color revolution attempts.

            Lol, you do know that the Georgian dream party is made up by the leadership of the rose revolution, right?

            Again with this word “authoritarian”. Funny how it’s always used against governments the West doesn’t like. It’s a very unserious word used by unserious people.

            Be mad at the dictionary I guess? I don’t control how governments arrange their hierarchical structures. Also, the US is friends with plenty of authoritarian countries.

            Now, the undoubtedly reactionary nature of these governments aside, isn’t it objectively a good thing that they are behaving that way?

            Not for the Georgian people…

            That they are undermining the western hegemonistic order for their own selfish interests?

            I think that’s a highly reductive interpretation that relies on oversimplified concepts of global politics, and political language.

            Hungary for instance has been a real thorn in the side of the pro-Ukraine warmongers in the EU and NATO.

            Have they really stopped anything, has this benefited Russia or the people of Hungary in any meaningful way? Also, I’d hardly call countries defending against an invasion the “warmongers” of the situation.

            Don’t you want dissent and disunity in the imperialist camp? I certainly do.

            Which imperialist camp?

            • cfgaussianOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              The communist party is a small part of the coalition of parties attempting to block the Georgian dream party.

              So if it’s acceptable for those “communists” to join forces with western backed color revolution agents, then surely it is not a big deal for other communists to critically support the Georgian government in its suppressing of said color revolutionists and reconciliation with Russia. Since we have abandoned any pretense of moral purity anyway…

              I’d hardly call countries defending against an invasion the “warmongers” of the situation.

              If that’s what you think is happening you haven’t been paying attention. You’re just regurgitating the western mainstream media’s propaganda narrative, which as usual is the exact opposite of reality.

              Yes they are the warmongers, they are the ones who purposely engineered the conflict and who continue to needlessly prolong it to Ukraine’s detriment, all while their reckless and desperate escalations risk widening the conflict and put us all in danger.

              They are not defending anything, they are merely using Ukraine to try and harm Russia. When just like Georgia, Ukraine’s interests would be best served by refusing to continue to be a western puppet and mending ties with Russia instead, that’s just a fact.

              Have they really stopped anything, has this benefited Russia or the people of Hungary in any meaningful way?

              So far they’ve prevented Hungary being drawn into to the conflict. Hungary has wisely refused to send weapons to the conflict zone, recognizing that by doing so it only prolongs the conflict and gets more Ukrainians and Russians killed.

              Of course it has benefited the people of Hungary. While other NATO and EU countries ruin their economies and impoverish their people with anti-Russian sanctions and billions flushed down the toilet in the corrupt black hole that is Ukraine, Hungary has looked out for its own people’s interest and kept energy prices and inflation low.

              When other NATO countries send their soldiers to die in Ukraine, Hungarian soldiers will still be safe in their own country. And when Russia strikes back at other NATO countries that have made the mistake of making themselves a co-belligerent in the conflict, Hungary will remain untouched.

              Turns out having good relations with and refusing to be drawn into conflict against a nearby major power is good for your people. I know, what a shocker!

              Which imperialist camp?

              There is only one imperialist camp

              • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                So if it’s acceptable for those “communists” to join forces with western backed color revolution agents

                So in your theory, the opposition parties are committing a color revolution…in a country that has had the same government since the Georgian Dream party did a color revolution?

                Do you know what a color revolution is?

                Also, it is quite arrogant of you to assume you know more about what’s good for Georgian communist than Georgian communist.

                that’s what you think is happening you haven’t been paying attention.

                I could lay the same claims at your feet? However, my argument is pretty well bolstered by the fact that only one nation is actually on someone else’s sovereign territory.

                Yes they are the warmongers, they are the ones who purposely engineered the conflict and who continue to needlessly prolong it to Ukraine’s detriment.

                Lol, you don’t think the people ordering bombs being dropped on civilians may have something to do with Ukrainian’s detriment?

                Next you’re going to claim that Palestine engineered their own genocide…

                There is only one imperialist camp

                Only if narrow the definition of imperialism to the point where it looses its inherent meaning.

                • cfgaussianOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  So in your theory, the opposition parties are committing a color revolution

                  They certainly tried. What else would you call it when western backed NGOs organize astroturfed protests and violent riots aimed at toppling the elected government because the government is trying to pass a law that would expose foreign funding of said NGOs? When western politicians shamelessly go to Georgia to participate in and support the protests, just like they did in Ukraine on the Maidan in 2014?

                  It doesn’t get much more transparent. Next you will claim that the Maidan coup was just a “peaceful revolution”, or that the violent western-funded mob in Hong Kong were just “pro-democracy activists”?

                  only one nation is actually on someone else’s sovereign territory.

                  NATO has been in Ukraine since 2014 and Ukrainian troops have been on Russian territory since 2022 when the new oblasts voted in a referendum to join Russia. And is a country really sovereign if their government is a puppet for foreign powers?

                  you don’t think the people ordering bombs being dropped on civilians may have something to do with Ukrainian’s detriment?

                  I do think that, which is why i said that the Nazi Kiev regime that was put in place by a western orchestrated coup is harming Ukraine.

                  They are the ones who have been dropping bombs on civilians in Donetsk and Lugansk since 2014. Them doing so forced Russia to intervene to protect those people and as a result there is now a larger conflict in Ukraine.

                  Next you’re going to claim that Palestine engineered their own genocide

                  Comparing Palestinians with Nazis who want to commit ethnic cleansing is grotesque genocide apologetics and literally a Zionist talking point. This shows to me that you are not engaging in good faith. Good bye.

                  • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Well…they tried. What else would you call it when western backed NGOs organize astroturfed protests and violent riots aimed at toppling the elected government because the government is trying to pass a law that would expose foreign funding of said NGOs?

                    Well typically a revolution would require a change in the status quo, not a protest against the government rapidly shifting policy.

                    They aren’t trying to create a revolution, they are trying to preserve the status quo. The reason they are upset is because it’s the same policy Orban used before cracking down on independent journalism.

                    NATO troops have been in Ukraine since 2014

                    Lol, invited of course. That’s not invading someone…

                    Ukrainian troops have been on Russian territory since 2022 when the new oblasts voted in a referendum to join Russia.

                    Lol, and now it’s okay for foreign governments influence voting…

                    Color revolution bad, Russia funding and arming separatist groups all over eastern Europe good.

                    Them doing so forced Russia to intervene to protect those people and as a result there is now a larger conflict in Ukraine.

                    Those people Russia armed and agitated against the government in the first place? How many of Russia’s neighbors actively have armed separatist regions being bolstered by Russian troops? Surely it’s just a coincidence, and surely Russia has a long history of being very empathetic towards minority groups…

                    Comparing Palestinians with Nazis who want to commit ethnic cleansing is grotesque genocide apologetics and literally a Zionist talking point.

                    My dude, you are literally repeating nationalist talking points. Maybe take your own advice and consume sources that aren’t funded by the Russian state.

                    This shows to me that you are not engaging in good faith

                    I very much doubt you ever engage with anyone in good faith.

        • cfgaussianOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Right, but what makes you think they are actually going to leave the EU?

          Are we still talking about Georgia or are you referring to a different country now? Is this a hypothetical scenario in an alternate reality?

          Because in this reality Georgia isn’t in the EU, never has been, and, inshallah, never will be.

    • 小莱卡
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Putin was also america’s guy, see how that turned out.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah… How did that turn out?

        I don’t particularly believe that Russia is anything but the first western state to evolve from capitalism to an authoritarian kleptocracy. They aren’t trying to end western hegemony, they’re just trying to change where they’re at on the ladder.

        How does it materially help workers if Russia does fight off NATO? It’s just exchanging one capitalist hierarchy for an even more authoritarian capitalist hierarchy. Their resources and labour are still being extracted from their country into the hands of billionaires.

          • 小莱卡
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            5 months ago

            capitalism in the west is fair and free but in Russia is ruthless and authoritarian.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Correct. The natural progression of late stage capitalism is a move further towards authoritarian capitalist kleptocracy.

            How do we tell if a nation is antithetical towards western imperialism, or if we’re just witnessing the beast eating its own tail?

            I would argue that we should look at the material motivations, and how capital is distributed within the nation. But I guess the enemy of my enemy is more catchy…

        • 小莱卡
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 months ago

          How does it materially help workers if Russia does fight off NATO? It’s just exchanging one capitalist hierarchy for an even more authoritarian capitalist hierarchy. Their resources and labour are still being extracted from their country into the hands of billionaires.

          The enemy of our enemy is our friend, it is as simple as that. When the west focuses it’s resources on fighting Russia, it gives the rest of the world breathing room, thus we have seen progressive movements grow in many places that would’ve been immediately crushed under other circumstances.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            The enemy of our enemy is our friend, it is as simple as that.

            I mean that’s a nice saying, but I’d hardly say it’s been proven over the course of History. It didn’t work out very well for the native Americans.

            When the west focuses it’s resources on fighting Russia, it gives the rest of the world breathing room

            Or it just empowers the capital holders of the military industrial complex and makes America even more aggressive. I hardly think America would be a more agreeable nation under a wartime economy.

            we have seen progressive movements grow in many places that would’ve been immediately crushed under other circumstances.

            Examples? Because in the last 2 decades we’ve seen a huge upswing of conservative authoritarian governments being established across the globe.

            • 小莱卡
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              5 months ago

              I mean that’s a nice saying, but I’d hardly say it’s been proven over the course of History. It didn’t work out very well for the native Americans.

              There are 2 sides to this coin, and in bad faith, you use the side that supports your views. The americans also used the very same strategy, but it worked out for them, what is the difference here? That the natives did not identify the americans as the primary contradiction. There are many other examples, like Chinese civil war, the korean war, vietnam war, etc… The point is to identify the primary contradiction, which in this case is american imperialism.

              Or it just empowers the capital holders of the military industrial complex and makes America even more aggressive. I hardly think America would be a more agreeable nation under a wartime economy.

              And you’re completely wrong, the decline of american hegemony is forcing them to give away concesions. Countries all around the world are joining BRICS, Yemen gets away with attacking Israel shipments, african nations are kicking out french and american troops of their countries, even Saudi Arabia is slowly dropping the petrodollar policy!!, something that was immediately punished with bombs in the past (lybia, irak, iran), americas “backyard” is now full of leftists goverments, etc… Its quite obvious that america is losing control.

              Examples? Because in the last 2 decades we’ve seen a huge upswing of conservative authoritarian governments being established across the globe.

              As i mentioned, americas “backyard”. Heck look at Mexico left party completely destroying the neoliberal parties and the US can’t do anything more than putting some NYT hit pieces here and there 😅

        • MarxMadness
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t particularly believe that Russia is anything but the first western state to evolve from capitalism to an authoritarian kleptocracy.

          The U.S.?

    • cfgaussianOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      who do you think was the person most responsible for Georgia joining the EU?

      Georgia isn’t in the EU. I think you’re a bit confused mate.