Well, it depends, im not personally and MLM, but my understanding is that the Philippines’ Maoism is different. Again, I may be wrong, but I think they believe that MLM was synthesized but not by Gonzalo. Depends, still though.
Philippines Maoism inherits the ideology of the Cultural Revolution and the Gang of Four. Gonzalo did the same thing. Hence it’s no surprise that Sison adopted the same maoist tactics as Gonzalo did in regards to theory. In terms of praxis, they were also both incredibly adventurist. Basically, Maoism in the Philippines is identical to the Maoism in Peru. We can draw a lot of parallels between the theories given by Gonzalo and the actions of the CPP. So even if MLM wasn’t synthesised by Gonzalo, he was definitely a big contributor to MLM theory, to the point where you would be a revisionist if you would denounce him.
Us poor Asian folks. They’ve trapped Sri Lanka, Laos, and Tajikistan in debt. My country the Philippines narrowly escaped a similar fate had Dutertwat not had stopped clock moment and pulled out of the deal.
maybe crop your email out the picture, not wise to do here, you know since some no life fascists can be very petty. (Lemmygrad is viewable without an account after all.)
You realize also that MLMs do not support Cuba either, right? They consider it “in the camp of Soviet social imperialism”.
How do you feel about Gonzalo?
About Gonzalo, I never heard of him since I’m to MLM, but I heard a lot of my camp hates him for something something reactionary.
Gonzalo is one of the top founders of your ideology.
Well, it depends, im not personally and MLM, but my understanding is that the Philippines’ Maoism is different. Again, I may be wrong, but I think they believe that MLM was synthesized but not by Gonzalo. Depends, still though.
Philippines Maoism inherits the ideology of the Cultural Revolution and the Gang of Four. Gonzalo did the same thing. Hence it’s no surprise that Sison adopted the same maoist tactics as Gonzalo did in regards to theory. In terms of praxis, they were also both incredibly adventurist. Basically, Maoism in the Philippines is identical to the Maoism in Peru. We can draw a lot of parallels between the theories given by Gonzalo and the actions of the CPP. So even if MLM wasn’t synthesised by Gonzalo, he was definitely a big contributor to MLM theory, to the point where you would be a revisionist if you would denounce him.
maybe im just a dumbass, sorry lol. Still learning some the history of the phillpines.
I don’t really consider Cuba social imperialist the way I consider China as such.
How is china “social imperialist?” Who are they imperializing?
Us poor Asian folks. They’ve trapped Sri Lanka, Laos, and Tajikistan in debt. My country the Philippines narrowly escaped a similar fate had Dutertwat not had stopped clock moment and pulled out of the deal.
Gonna need a source on that bullshit.
Let’s see.
Using debt for diplomatic leverage is unacceptable even for the advancements of socialism.
Fuck, you linked Wikipedia, and a pro-US professor who seems to just write a bunch of anti china articles for the Western press.
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-threat-to-us-global-leadership-is-china-not-russia-by-brahma-chellaney-2022-02
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-xi-jinping-three-warfares-by-brahma-chellaney-2021-12
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/us-defend-taiwan-from-chinese-invasion-by-brahma-chellaney-2021-10
China is not doing “debt trap diplomacy”, that’s the world bank and IMFs strategies.
Is China Imperialist?
A YouTube link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same video on Invidious, which is a YouTube frontend that protects your privacy:
maybe crop your email out the picture, not wise to do here, you know since some no life fascists can be very petty. (Lemmygrad is viewable without an account after all.)
Here’s a web archive of that link