Ahhh, that makes more sense but still leaves me wondering why does The Prince need a refutation? The book’s thesis is how to maintain your monarch status. Are there actually monarchist debate perverts out there trying to take on ancaps citing The Prince?
if you look at the broader mass of libertarians, tons of them have really sus monarchist cravings. In Poland there is even offcial libertarian-monarchist-neonazi party in parliament.
Konfederacja Wolność i Niepodległość (Confederation Liberty and Independence - in the true post 1989 Polish spirit of outrageously incorrect party names)
How is The Prince a refutation of “statism” lol
Ancaps are extremely dumb
The Prince is supposedly the work being refuted by The Politics of Obedience, not the refutation itself. Same with Mises being a refutation of Marx.
Ahhh, that makes more sense but still leaves me wondering why does The Prince need a refutation? The book’s thesis is how to maintain your monarch status. Are there actually monarchist debate perverts out there trying to take on ancaps citing The Prince?
if you look at the broader mass of libertarians, tons of them have really sus monarchist cravings. In Poland there is even offcial libertarian-monarchist-neonazi party in parliament.
What is the name of that Party? So I can read about their stupidity.
Konfederacja Wolność i Niepodległość (Confederation Liberty and Independence - in the true post 1989 Polish spirit of outrageously incorrect party names)