The Israeli rescue service Zaka says its paramedics removed more than 260 bodies from a music festival that came under attack by Hamas militants.

The total figure of bodies found is expected to be higher, as other paramedic teams were also working in the area and Zaka added that the bodies “haven’t all been collected yet”.

Early on Saturday morning, Hamas targeted Nova music festival, a techno rave in the desert near the border with Gaza.

Videos shared on social media and by Israeli news outlets showed dozens of festival-goers running through an open field as gunshots rang out. Many hid in nearby fruit orchards or were gunned down as they fled.

  • BB69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    228
    arrow-down
    60
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wholesale slaughter of innocents? What a way to show Palestinians are the ones we should support.

    • there1snospoon@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      148
      arrow-down
      89
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had been pretty much on the Palestinian side of the conflict for some time.

      This attack has absolutely burnt any goodwill I had for the Palestinian cause. If Mexico attacked America in this manner, we would likely own everything south of the Gulf of California.

      I cannot fathom what Hamas thought would come of this.

      • NAXLAB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        187
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Palestine” is not the one that did this. Hamas is a terrorist group, and their actions do not justify the fact that the Israeli government operates an apartheid state where people are given rights, status, and property on the basis of race, and also participates in the slaughter of innocent people.

        This isn’t a “whoever’s worse should lose” situation. Israel commits human rights violations and Hamas is a terrorist group.

        • Nevoic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I hate the phrasing “terrorist group” here. Not because what happened here wasn’t an atrocity, but because people generally refuse to call state-backed violence “terrorist” violence. The word terrorism is incredibly broad, easily describing a ton of things Israel does. Yet, we refuse to call them a terrorist organization.

          Israel slaughtered hundreds of protesters 4 years ago in Gaza.

          Israel and Egypt have been blockading the Gaza strip in violation of the GCIV since 2007.

          In 2014, a triple-homicide was committed. Israel claimed it was Hamas, and arrested hundreds of Palestinians. Hamas sent rockets into Israel, killing 2 people, and Israel initiated Operation Protective Edge, killing thousands of Palestinians.

          Not to mention the entire Israel-Palestine conflict can be traced back about 100 years, where imperialist Britain endorsed the idea of a Jewish homeland in Palestine in the Balfour Declaration. Eventually leading to the formation of Israel in the late 40s and the subsequent ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, forcing nearly a million natives to move to make way for Israel.

          “terrorism” is politically charged language with the intent of making us sympathize with a certain side. Of course we’ll side with the “Israel state” and against the “Hamas terrorist group”. The language used to describe these groups already prescribes how we should view them. Western media will never describe Israel’s atrocities as terrorist actions, so people will dismiss the slaughter of tens or even hundreds of thousands of innocent Palestinians as “just war”.

        • BB69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          80
          arrow-down
          73
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hamas is the governing body of Palestine.

          It was Palestine who did this.

          • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            77
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Strictly speaking, it’s the governing body of Gaza, which hasn’t held elections in well over a decade. The West Bank is governed by the party Fatah, which is much less militant.

            There is, however, the awkward truth that the West Bank has also not held elections in a long time, precisely because Hamas would probably win them.

          • Jaderick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            62
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            By this logic all Iranians support their current Islamist government, which everyone and their mother knows to not be true.

            • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Did Germany support everything the Nazis did? No, not every citizen, but it was enough support to give Hitler his rise to power and descend into WWII.

              Did Afghanistan support everything the Taliban did? No, but war was the only response to 9/11.

              In the end, war sucks and many innocent people will be caught in the crossfire. But, I don’t see any other end result out of this. Israel has been so beaten down by terrorist attacks and hostility since literally the day the country was formed that war is the only way forward. They have tried every other option for the last 50 years.

              • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                So in the end, every Israeli citizen is responsible for all of this violence, since it’s their government doing the ethnic cleansing and apartheid. They actually elected the fascists who have a million times more power than Hamas to end all of this, so every Israeli is basically evil. Thanks for clearing that up for us!

            • BB69@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              My government doesn’t have a 75% approval rating like Hamas does.

            • Ulv@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              29
              ·
              1 year ago

              No but i still am part of my country. Every thing my government does represents my country and therefore me.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hamas is the governing body of Gaza. They don’t control the West Bank where the majority of Palestinians live.

          • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            I see your intent here but you’re going to have to say you killed all the Iraqis and Afghanis who didn’t deserve to die in our wars in the middle east, if you’re going to say Palestine is the one who did this.

            Sometimes bodies meant to represent and govern in fact do not represent while they govern.

            • TheYear2525@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              24
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              you’re going to have to say you killed

              No, to be consistent they’d have to say America killed them. No need to switch from blaming a country to blaming an individual citizen.

              I think a majority of Americans would admit America killed them.

              • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think it’s quite obvious they were using the royal ‘you’, as in America (almost every American assumes everyone else is also American in the internet unless otherwise stated).

                And they’re right, American soldiers did unspeakable things in Afghanistan and Iraq, but that doesn’t mean all Americans are responsible for the decisions those soldiers made.

                  • can@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I do hope you’ll appreciate that everyone isn’t American though and assuming any given poster is is borderline insulting.

              • dx1@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Forget about consistency, this is just flat out incorrect. You’re trying to equate two different distinct sets of people, one of which contains the other.

                Group A (superset) includes Bob, Alice, Sue, Mike, Cole, Anthony, Tony, Joanna, and Jerry.

                Group B (subset #1) includes Bob, Alice, Sue, Mike. They voted for Anthony to run group A and received a majority, so Anthony assumed power.

                Group C (subset #2) includes Anthony, Sue, Mike, and Joanna. They form a government and military over/of group A. They kill a bunch of people.

                Group C is NOT EQUAL TO group A. Period. No argument, no “but what if”, they are two different groups. Note that Cole, Tony and Jerry (group D) are flatly not represented in any way by the actions of group C.

        • Cryptic Fawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Palestine” is not the one that did this.

          Palestinians overwhelmingly support Hamas. They allowed this shit to fester.

      • falconhoof@artemis.camp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        127
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        We shouldn’t conflate the people of Isreal with the extremist State of Isreal, we shouldn’t conflate the people of Palestine with Hamas. Atrocities have been committed on both sides and each one is an atrocity, but the fact remains that the Palestinian people are living under an apartheid and therefore should be supported despite acts committed by extremists in it’s name. This situation shouldn’t be reduced to a simplistic one-sided team sport. Palestine still needs liberating.

        • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          48
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s difficult to not conflate them with hammas when 80% supprts them and celebrated the attack

              • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You expect me to believe you would simply leave behind the place you were born and all of your loved ones?

                • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Already did so actually and it wasn’t even comparable to the situation in gaza so yes , I would definitely leave … I don’t care if you don’t believe me.

                  Edit: actually you can search my comments from before the recent attacks and find a few that support the fact i am an expatriate.

                  • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Fair enough. From what country are you a refugee, if you don’t mind me asking?

              • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                "Sorry bucko gate is locked, if you even get too close to it an Israeli sniper shoots you in the knee (be grateful next time it’s the head!). Get back in the cage! "

                Ok, now what do you do?

              • dx1@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                My source is a comprehensive poll covering a bunch of different topics. Most centrally:

                If new parliamentary elections were held today with the participation of all political forces that participated in the 2006 elections, 64% say they would participate in them, and among these participants, Fateh receives 36%, Hamas’ Change and Reform 34%, all other lists combined 9%, and 21% say they have not yet decided whom they will vote for. Three months ago, vote for Hamas stood at 34% and Fatah at 33%. Vote for Hamas in the Gaza Strip stands today at 44% (compared to 44% three months ago) and for Fateh at 32% (compared to 28% three months ago). In the West Bank, vote for Hamas stands at 24% (compared to 25% three months ago) and Fatah at 40% (compared to 34% three months ago).

                A little over a quarter (27%) believe that Hamas is the most deserving of representing and leading the Palestinian people today while 24% believe that Fateh under the leadership of Abbas is more deserving; 44% believe both are unworthy of representation and leadership. Three months ago, 31% said Hamas is the most deserving, 21% said Fateh led by Abbas is the most deserving, and 43% said both are unworthy of representation and leadership.

                which isn’t even close to 80% no matter how you look at it.

                Your NBC News one says this:

                The group’s popularity grew after a two-week conflict with Israel in 2021, with roughly 75% of those polled viewing Hamas as safeguarding the Al-Aqsa Mosque and other Muslim holy sites in East Jerusalem.

                which is a very different thing than general approval…

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hamas isn’t a rational actor fighting for a free Palestine; their one and only goal - literally written into their charter - is to eradicate every Jew from the land by force.

        Every Jew they kill is a victory for them; there’s nothing more to it.

      • tiny_tina_@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dont forget the paraded naked woman that was spit on by people. Hamas are savages who are funded by Iran

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        This was an Iranian funded terrorist group, not a Palestinian liberation group. They claim to help the latter, but this attack makes it obvious they don’t give a shit about Palestinians, they just sent to hurt Israelis. Everyone is better off if the group can be destroyed.

      • esc27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m starting to wonder if that is the point. Groups like Hamas thrive on anger and conflict.

      • sederx@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        so 0.05% of the population can make you change your political view about 2 millions people(plus people in west bank because fuck em right?)

        then you never supported a free palestine

      • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You support Palestine while they do nothing and go like sheep to the slaughter. Once they fight back to avoid their own anhilation you no longer support them. In the end, you support genocide.

          • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            If they value their statehood, yes.

            If Germany took care of their Nazi problem before it festered, the rest of the world wouldn’t have had to deal with the entirety of World War II, and German citizens wouldn’t have been punished with the brutal East/West division of its country. Countries should not tolerate fascism and terrorism within their own ranks, no matter who’s side they are on.

            • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So Israel should first overthrow and destroy the Likud party and most of the rest of their parties, which are all fascist, instead of dropping more bombs on Gaza.

        • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Overthrow the violent military group holding them hostage?

          That’s had Israel’ tactic approval to act as preferred enemy, which has international support?

          Good fucking luck.

          • mwguy@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            In Gaza, they did in the mid 2000s. They even evicted all Jewish settlers and settlements, some at gunpoint; in an effort to secure peace.

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Palestine

          And what government body do you propose is “Palestine”. This is why Israel is an apartheid state.

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m sure Hamas thought the same thing about Israeli citizens and the Gaza blockade.

          Remember everyone: It’s okay when white people do it.

      • Genericusername@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Remind me how many Palestinians support Hamas and its ideology. You cannot make this comparison. Nothing Israel ever did comes near these levels of brutality.

        • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Israel literally kills more civilians and children than Hamas does. They are quite literally more brutal, more violent, and are the clear aggressor in the conflict so have less excuse for all of it. Palestine is not occupying Israel.

        • sederx@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          90% of the dead people in this conflict are Palestinians. this is a walk int he park comparatively for israel

    • drekly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      66
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s always those pesky Palestinians doing the slaughtering! For 75 years!

      That’s how they’ve been taking more and more land from Israel and they even build a gigantic illegal wall to box those poor Israelis in and stop them being able to leave freely! And with their military backing and funding from giant powerhouses in the west, those poor Israelis don’t stand a chance, it’s about time they fought back and stood up for themselves! They should defend their homes just like Ukraine!

      Wait…

      • nyctre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, all revolutions in the history of the world are famous for rising against evil teenagers who were oppressing them.

        • drekly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Let’s hope Russia doesn’t start holding music festivals in Bakhmut

      • e_mc2@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        And exactly how does your argument justify these atrocities? This is whataboutism pur sang. Don’t get me wrong, the atrocities Israel has carried out are equally appalling, but that doesn’t justify what happened at that festival. This will likely only weaken the support the Palestinians have in the west.

        • vind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          47
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t justify the atrocities, but to immediately drop your support of the Palestinian people due to the acts of a militant group (likely orchestrated by Iran) is just dumb.

          • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            It is what it is. The world needs some semblance of order and you can’t just go fucking killing this many civilians because somebody took your land. It doesn’t work and you can get fucked if this is how you think. Nobody’s saying Israel is the good guy here. Fact is, everyone here sucks, there’s no good guy just a bunch of innocent fucking civilians who don’t deserve any of this on either side.

            • Jaderick@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It is what it is. The world needs some semblance of order and you can’t just go fucking killing this many civilians because somebody took your land.

              So by this logic, Native Americans should’ve just accepted Manifest Destiny?

              The rest of your statement is fine, the first part is stupid.

              Edit: this isn’t support for Hamas’ actions, this is the consequence of Israel’s very real policies and actions that lead to stupid people with a lot of anger targeting civilians

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I just think people talking about killing civilians at a music festival being an atrocity (it is!) were probably really quiet about the regular civilian casualties caused by Israel year after year. In 12 years, the UN counted 5,590 deaths. That’s not 5,590 dead terrorists, but people are acting like the atrocities just started now. I’m very much willing to say “what about”, not because it should make people think this one isn’t horrible, but because they really should answer “what about the other ones you ignored”.

          And one doesn’t even need to go backward. Israel’s already racking up civilian casualties, and you can bet there’s going to be some people who want to keep going until the Palestinian number is much higher than the Israeli number.

          • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Plenty of people, within Israel and outside, care quite a lot about those deaths and also consider them tragedies. You’ll remember that Netanyahu isn’t exactly an uncontroversial figure within Israel.

            That’s why this has been such an incredibly frustrating and disappointing series of events, because any possibility of peace has been thoroughly extinguished now, and Palestinian citizens are going to suffer even more. Hamas of course knew this going into it, and didn’t care because its aim has never been peace for Palestinians, but rather the extermination of all Jews within Israel (as explicitly stated in its founding charter).

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Both Netanyahu and Hamas are probably riding a nice high right now. Both of their political positions improve the more people die on both sides.

              • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                There may be a real rally around the flag effect, but there’s a lot of anger at Netanyahu on the massive military and intelligence failures that made this possible. He may be able to stick around for this conflict, but he’s probably toast afterwards.

                Likud’s entire thing has always been that they’re the ones that can be trusted to keep Israelis safe. That view is now completely shattered.

                • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Perhaps there’s a glimmer of hope then. If a less conservative and radical party takes control, maybe we’ll see an independent Palestinian state that’s allied with Israel and jointly fights Hamas.

                  Unfortunately that’s very unrealistic :/. We’ll probably see an even more radical conservative group take power, and make us think Netanyahu was a saint in comparison. :/

                  • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That assumes that there is a sizable portion of Palestinians that want to fight Hamas, and there’s sadly no guarantee of that.

        • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Does the graph you just dismissed not make it clear they are absolutely not “equally appalling?”

          Seems to me by the numbers they are far more appalling.

          Edited to add: It does not justify the most recent attack, but it seems bizarre to pretend this is “both sides bad” when it’s “both sides bad, but one side objectively does a lot more bad”

          • drekly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s because the media is super biased in the UK and US, I assume. The reporting on the BBC has been all about how bad Palestine have been acting but nothing about what Israel is doing to them.

            OF COURSE attacking a music festival is bad. But in context, I’m not fucking surprised they’re lashing out, and with more context, I think most people would feel pretty extremist if they were being killed and pushed out of their homes constantly for almost 100 years.

            But hey the UK/US has to pretend nothing ireal does is wrong because they created this mess.

          • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            but one side objectively does a lot more bad

            This is only true because Israel is good at stopping attacks, not because Hamas isn’t trying.

            Graph intentional attacks targeted at civilians and you’ll get a very different picture. Personally, if someone tried to murder my family but failed, I wouldn’t find them blameless just because they didn’t succeed.

              • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Israel had occupied Gaza like it does the West Bank until 2005 when it withdrew, in hopes that it would lead to peace.

                It was very shortly followed by a barrage of rocket attacks and the current blockade was enacted.

                So, that has been tried. It wasn’t very effective.

                • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Honest question because maybe what I think is the answer is not actually the answer.

                  How much land does Israel currently occupy that is outside the bounds of what was originally agreed as belonging to them?

                  • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The 1967 borders are the most recent broadly recognized boundaries. After the Six Days War, Israel gained control of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Golan Heights, and Gaza.

                    As of today, East Jerusalem is a diverse but uneasy mix of Jews and Palestinians. Israel maintains that a unified Jerusalem is its capital, and this is the de facto situation. According to general peace plans, an eventual Palestinian state is meant to have East Jerusalem as its capital, so this is an obvious conflict point.

                    The West Bank is divided into three areas: A - administered by the Palestinian Authority, B - jointly administered by the PA and Israel, and C - administered by Israel. Israel has been increasingly building more and more settlements within Area C, which are widely recognized as illegal and being incredibly counter-productive towards peace. The Israelis who move there are often extremely nationalistic and often commit violence against the Palestinians. The IDF routinely conducts operations throughout all areas in order to ostensibly maintain security, though they’ll always prioritize Israeli lives over Palestinians.

                    The naive and now utterly hopeless idealistic peace plan is the creation of a Palestinian state consisting of the West Bank and Gaza with a capital in East Jerusalem, with the city being managed by a bi-national coalition of both governments. Israeli settlements within the West Bank would be either abandoned or annexed into Israel with an equal amount of land being swapped from Israel to Palestine. Some kind of stable passage would be created to connect Gaza and the West Bank.

                    One issue is that a not-small portion of Israelis believe themselves to be entitled to the entire land by virtue of religion, and see continued settlement of the West Bank as furthering this goal. These people suck and aren’t that much better than Hamas, though they’re not quite as barbaric. The much harder issue is that no Israeli will never allow this solution to happen unless Israel’s security is guaranteed, and there is simply zero trust in that, especially now. Israel will not allow itself to sit next to a state run by terrorists that are hell-bent on killing every Jew in the country.

                    On the matter of international law, Israel justifies its actions by accurately stating that no internationally recognized state lays claim to the West Bank - Jordan withdrew all claims in 1967 - and as such they have a right to settle it. Essentially no other countries have recognized that claim, and there has always been a general agreement that the West Bank will form the basis of a future Palestinian state. Israel certainly hasn’t acted in a way that furthers this, but as I said before, its red line is that it will not tolerate security threats to its existence. Militant Palestinian groups attacking Israel only makes peace more and more impossible.

                    So long as many Palestinians see the mere existence every Jew in Israel as a crime and a target, Israel will see every Palestinian as a potential threat, and the fact of the matter is that Israel holds the guns.

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s see a chart of the number of attempted murders of civilians from each side. That’ll paint a pretty different picture.

        Tell me, because we both know that the Israeli casualty number is only low because Israel is good at protecting its citizens and not because Hamas isn’t trying to kill as many Israelis as it can, do you really think the situation would be better if Hamas was more successful at killing Israelis?

        • drekly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course not, I think they’re both fucking ridiculous fighting over a place named in their own personal fairytale.

          One side being stronger doesn’t make the things they do right.

          • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            And to the exact same point, one side being less successful at killing citizens doesn’t make them right either.

            • drekly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Just because our military is in your country, stealing land, and keep killing you REALLY WELL, doesn’t mean you can retaliate to stop us.

              You should tell Ukraine.

              I don’t think your justification of “they’re just really good at killing Palestinians” really helps

              • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                If Hamas didn’t conduct military operations out of civilian buildings specifically so that the retaliation will kill civilians, that number would be a lot lower.

                Ultimately, you either think that rape and murder of civilians for absolutely no reason is something that can be justified, or you don’t.

      • nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        Keep those downvotes coming, Zionists. No matter how much you sweaty virtue signalers try to ‘own’ people on the internet, it doesn’t change the fact that Israel caged an animal, tortured it, and are now trying to put it down because it bit back.

        You and I both know that equating the entire population of Palestine to an Iraq/Qatar-funded extremist group is entirely wrong, but whatever justifies the wholesale slaughter of thousands over the years I guess. Stop pretending to care about Israeli citizens so you can feel good about watching Palestinians die.