• ComradeSalad
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Granted, they did start using the swastika 20 years before the Germans did. But the fact they didn’t change it during or after the war is very telling.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It has been changed since (in 1945) and it’s only used very rarely. I think there’s some pride there about lot “letting Nazis ruin the logo”. It was one of major Finnish national symbols prior to Nazis and used since like iron ages. So bit of pride involved there.

        Funny story. Finnish president Urho Kekkonen was visiting French president Charles de Gaulle and gave him a honory knighthood thing. Only problem, the symbolic necklace came with swastikas. Of course de Gaulle wasn’t a huge fan of that and Finns, realizing the issue, later changed the necklace and sent him the new one. Giving de Gaulle a swastika necklace as a present, lol.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know if you noticed the 1918 there. I’m not sure even proto-Nazis were around that time.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                As far as I know time moves in just one direction and those dates are after 1918. I’m sorry, I’m not trying to gross you out on purpose. I just don’t understand calling it a Nazi symbol for how it was used after Finnish Air Force adopted it. To me it seems clear that if it was adopted before those things existed/happened then how could they have adopted a Nazi symbol?

                  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I think if we consider those Aryan purity people proto-Nazis (and I think we can) then I admit to being wrong about proto-Nazis being around.

                  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I was refuting your claim that Nazism wasn’t around at the time.

                    The time was 1918 and you cited stuff from 1919 and 1922?

                    And what’s your excuse for it’s continued use after 1920, when it publicly became a Nazi symbol?

                    I’d imagine they didn’t want to change their logo because of some German party, at least first.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s where it started but I wouldn’t call him a proto-Nazi at that point. But in any case, point was that when the symbol was adopted, it had nothing to do with Nazis. Unless something being Nazi is some sort of transitive property, traveling back through the chain to 1918.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Two decades after Finnish air force had adopted it. Saying it’s Nazi imaginery based on that would seem a bit strange, like the property of something being Nazi travels back in time.

          • ComradeSalad
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            He was the Brother in law to Herman Goering lmaoooo. That “Swedish count” was a high ranking Nazi.