• cfgaussian
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The difference is that in the case of the US that was a lie. And Ukraine being a US proxy is not actually the weaker party in this, Russia is because they don’t have the full backing of an alliance like NATO behind them. So Russia was entirely justified in feeling threatened by a militarized russophobic Nazi regime, not on the other side of an ocean but right on their border, wanting to join a hostile military alliance who openly declare that their principal enemy is Russia.

      People who try to draw superficial comparisons between Ukraine and Iraq are lying by omission because literally everything about this is different.

        • CascadeOfLight [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If Ukraine couldn’t defend itself due to US support, there would have been no war in the first place.

          The threat of NATO having bases ON the Russian border is why this war is happening.

          But don't take it from me, take it from this guy

          Or better yet, how about the CIA?

          They knew in 2008 that this was THE red line for Russia, then laughed and crossed it anyway, and it played out EXACTLY as their analysts said it would

            • zkrzsz [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              And it comes back to my original point that the war was pre-emptive attack on a weaker sovereign nation for the stated purpose of defending the stronger nation from possible attack. This war has Bush doctrine all over it.

              It’s more complicated than that. There is still context from 2014 up till now, Minsk 1 and 2. Russia tried diplomacy talks then the SMO happened.

            • Shrike502
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              2008 was Georgia, what are you talking about?

            • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are you talking about 2014, when the U.S. orchestrated a coup in Ukraine, and Crimean residents were overwhelmingly in favor of joining Russia, foreshadowing the following decade of low-intensity civil war leading up to the current war?

                • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Is Niger right next door to France? Did the most powerful country on the planet, that has been trying to destroy France for a century, instigate that coup, start arming up the Nigerien military, and then intimate that Niger would be allowed to join its aggressive military alliance? Do Nigeriens want to join France?

                  these votes only seem to happen immediately after an invasion without any international observation

                  You’re right to be skeptical. However, look at things like the shared political history of Russia and Crimea (both in the USSR longer than modern Ukraine has existed), the disagreeements between Crimea and Ukraine dating back to the 90s, the presence of ethnic Russians in the region, the absence of violence before or after the annexation, and the separatist movements in parts of Ukraine that also have large ethnic Russian populations. Nothing about the situation – other than western propaganda – suggests Russia is there against the will of the people.