Welcome again to everybody! This is your friendly reminder, growling at the United States from Orbit is praxis Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is our weekly discussion thread!

We have a Matrix homeserver at genzedong.xyz. See this thread for information about our Matrix space.

Short reading list for new MLs here. To find theory, try marxists.org, Anna’s Archive, libgen, or Sci-Hub (for scientific articles). If an article is unavailable, try the Wayback Machine.

  • Shrike502
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Handheld ones? Asking because the TOS-1 has been used plenty in the war, and while it’s likely classified as an MLRS by the west, it’s called “heavy flamethrower system” in Russian.

    Likewise, Shmel thermobaric launcher is also classified as a “flamethrower”.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah with the Russian military you can pretty much always translate “flamethrower” as some kind of thermobaric weapons. Flamethrowers are kids stuff when you can turn entire buildings in to dust or rip the lungs out of everyone in a bunker complex without having to get within a mile of it.

      • Shrike502
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aye, I figured it required clarification because when one reads “flamethrower” in media, it usually brings up the image of a WW1 style firehose with a backpack canister, wielded by a gasmask-wearing German. Which I suspect might be intentional.

        They’re still horrendous weapons, imo. But surely it’s not as horrific as using white phosphorus, like the yanks did in Iraq?