hm okay I don’t think that’s true but so far it’s just an observation, there’s no problem saying that.
Or just go ahead and ban me now I don’t think this place can actually tackle uncomfortable positions Marxists must look at
oh no bb what is u doing.
Bruh you just went from an observation to an opinion with a snap of the fingers. You don’t even understand the studies you’re linking!
This study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1556756/ in particular. Pedophiles are only attracted to children, they see absolutely no sexual attraction to adults. That is what this study is comparing. It’s not saying gay men, who would otherwise be attracted to adult men, are more likely to be pedophiles because that’s not how it works.
The rest of the world will never accept LGBT
Are you aware non-binary identities have existed prior to 2020 (even prior to Jesus Christ) in non-anglo cultures?
we must ask why actually existing socialist states in their most revolutionary periods banned LGBT.
communism is when you ban lgbt and the more you ban lgbt the more communist you are. if u dont ban lgbt u are actually not revolution u are evil deng xiaoping reformist 😠 😠
Or do they dress like debutantes: french aristocrats entering high society?
what the fuck are you even talking about. Are you the kind of person to yell at a factory worker for owning a BMW both of you know he can’t afford but still feels obligated to because of social pressure?
the conception of being a women
Ah yes the diamat analysis of being a W O M A N. marxism is when i confirm my worldview and can use language to justify it. otherwise its not marxism, its bourgeois decadence.
Perhaps you are the one who should be tackling uncomfortable positions? I can tell you right now you are not on the right side of history in this fight.
Literally every study there is there is an undeniable link between homosexuals and pederasts
Analysis of all reported cases of sexual violence by women in Texas, revealed that 67% of women who molested children between the ages of 7 and 12 were homosexual. Taking into account the ratio of homosexual and non-homosexual women (2,3% vs 97,7%), it turns out that compared with heterosexual women, pedophiles among lesbians in 86 times (!) more: (67 ÷ 2,3) ÷ (33 ÷ 97,7) ≈ 86.
communism is when you ban lgbt and the more you ban lgbt the more communist you are. if u dont ban lgbt u are actually not revolution u are evil deng xiaoping reformist 😠
So your comment reveals a lot about your politics so tell me if I’m wrong in any of my assumptions:
Presumably you support Deng and his following successors up to the current Gen Sec Xi Jinping.
And that you believe (as I do especially after the cia files came out after him) that Xi Jinping has put China on a more Marxist road?
Xi “chose to survive by
becoming redder than the red.” He joined the Party and began
mapping out a career plan that would take him to the top of
the system. In our contact’s view, Xi is supremely pragmatic
and a realist, driven not by ideology but by a combination of
ambition and “self-protection.” Xi is a true “elitist” at
heart, according to our contact, believing that rule by a
dedicated and committed Communist Party leadership is the key
to enduring social stability and national strength.
Ah yes the diamat analysis of being a W O M A N. marxism is when i confirm my worldview and can use language to justify it. otherwise its not marxism, its bourgeois decadence.
You can say as you like. Things serve one class or another and there’s a reason transexuals do not dress like peasant women who work 14 hour days on a rice farm and then go get beaten by their husbands. Their idealised vision of themselves is inherently bourgeois
I can tell you right now you are not on the right side of history in this fight.
LGBT are fake identities created by neoliberalism precisely because homosexuality is a behaviour not something bestowed on you at birth. If Communist parties outside the imperial core (tell me an actual effective one inside the core lmao) don’t want to commit collective suicide by bowing to a million US sponsored NGOs promoting LGBT ideology as a political movement in a proletariat that wholesale rejects it I don’t blame them.
This is getting silly. I stopped listening when you tried to say gay people are more prone to being pedophiles – because that’s what you’re implying, even when both studies you linked do not (and you even completely misinterpreted the first one, and the second one I can’t find that sentence you pulled out of it).
You’ve spent too much time thinking about this, I can tell from all the links you’ve got prepared. Maybe you need to go outside and take a deep breath. This isn’t healthy.
transexuals do not dress like peasant women
… do you dress like a peasant?
But you still haven’t answered the most important question in my previous comment: are you or are you not aware that non-binary identities have existed prior to colonisation?
You’ve spent too much time thinking about this, I can tell from all the links you’ve got prepared. Maybe you need to go outside and take a deep breath. This isn’t healthy.
I don’t particularly care about it - but its interesting that its literally all the homonationalists that make up 90% of the communist movement want to talk about. And it’s interesting that on a post about the KKEs 21st congress it’s devolved into IdPol and homonationalist fuckery because KKE don’t accept or view LGBT as anything more than a neoliberal creation
… do you dress like a peasant?
I dress like an absolutely normal working class prole (which is the majority class of my country) rather than a sexualised, bourgeois about to attend an orgy.
Those are not the same thing, you haven’t answered the question still. You can just say if you weren’t aware homosexuality and non-binary identities have existed throughout history, it’s alright.
hm okay I don’t think that’s true but so far it’s just an observation, there’s no problem saying that.
oh no bb what is u doing.
Bruh you just went from an observation to an opinion with a snap of the fingers. You don’t even understand the studies you’re linking!
This study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1556756/ in particular. Pedophiles are only attracted to children, they see absolutely no sexual attraction to adults. That is what this study is comparing. It’s not saying gay men, who would otherwise be attracted to adult men, are more likely to be pedophiles because that’s not how it works.
Are you aware non-binary identities have existed prior to 2020 (even prior to Jesus Christ) in non-anglo cultures?
communism is when you ban lgbt and the more you ban lgbt the more communist you are. if u dont ban lgbt u are actually not revolution u are evil deng xiaoping reformist 😠 😠
what the fuck are you even talking about. Are you the kind of person to yell at a factory worker for owning a BMW both of you know he can’t afford but still feels obligated to because of social pressure?
Ah yes the diamat analysis of being a W O M A N. marxism is when i confirm my worldview and can use language to justify it. otherwise its not marxism, its bourgeois decadence.
Perhaps you are the one who should be tackling uncomfortable positions? I can tell you right now you are not on the right side of history in this fight.
Literally every study there is there is an undeniable link between homosexuals and pederasts
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B:SEBU.0000023061.77061.17
So your comment reveals a lot about your politics so tell me if I’m wrong in any of my assumptions:
Presumably you support Deng and his following successors up to the current Gen Sec Xi Jinping.
And that you believe (as I do especially after the cia files came out after him) that Xi Jinping has put China on a more Marxist road?
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09BEIJING3128_a.html
So why did he start a crackdown on lgbt?
You can say as you like. Things serve one class or another and there’s a reason transexuals do not dress like peasant women who work 14 hour days on a rice farm and then go get beaten by their husbands. Their idealised vision of themselves is inherently bourgeois
LGBT are fake identities created by neoliberalism precisely because homosexuality is a behaviour not something bestowed on you at birth. If Communist parties outside the imperial core (tell me an actual effective one inside the core lmao) don’t want to commit collective suicide by bowing to a million US sponsored NGOs promoting LGBT ideology as a political movement in a proletariat that wholesale rejects it I don’t blame them.
This is getting silly. I stopped listening when you tried to say gay people are more prone to being pedophiles – because that’s what you’re implying, even when both studies you linked do not (and you even completely misinterpreted the first one, and the second one I can’t find that sentence you pulled out of it).
You’ve spent too much time thinking about this, I can tell from all the links you’ve got prepared. Maybe you need to go outside and take a deep breath. This isn’t healthy.
… do you dress like a peasant?
But you still haven’t answered the most important question in my previous comment: are you or are you not aware that non-binary identities have existed prior to colonisation?
Which party are you affiliated with?
I don’t particularly care about it - but its interesting that its literally all the homonationalists that make up 90% of the communist movement want to talk about. And it’s interesting that on a post about the KKEs 21st congress it’s devolved into IdPol and homonationalist fuckery because KKE don’t accept or view LGBT as anything more than a neoliberal creation
I dress like an absolutely normal working class prole (which is the majority class of my country) rather than a sexualised, bourgeois about to attend an orgy.
Are you or are you not aware that non-binary identities have existed prior to colonisation?
So did wide spread polygamy, polygny, polyandry… What’s your point?
Those are not the same thing, you haven’t answered the question still. You can just say if you weren’t aware homosexuality and non-binary identities have existed throughout history, it’s alright.