Kind of amazing how many instances are blocking lemmygrad as soon as they’re created. I know that liberals really don’t like dissenting opinions but goddamn

  • ☭ Comrade Pup Ivy 🇨🇺
    link
    1711 months ago

    shakes fist BEEHAW … and other instences in your vain that are painfully liberal, but they all feel almost exactly the same so ill just call them all part of the beehaw colony

    • @CriticalResist8A
      link
      1111 months ago

      Lol well beehaw is completely down right now, just completely flat on the ground dead, nothing is loading.

      • @CriticalResist8A
        link
        1411 months ago

        I know I’m beating a dead horse but I find it funny that beehaw claims they want to “help to connect underprivileged and minority individuals with education and civic participation by promoting a healthier online experience.”. Meanwhile all marginalised minorities flock to communism and lemmygrad and their admin team is white person, white person, and white person.

        • ☭ Comrade Pup Ivy 🇨🇺
          link
          8
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          How exactly are they doing any of that, all i see from them are meaningless plattitudes and a heavily locked down instance, from what I can gather users cannot even create their own communities on that instance.

        • @pleasemakesense@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          -511 months ago

          Well there are different degrees of how left you are, liking the CCP and the DPRK is too much for most, even communists

          • @RedSquid
            link
            1211 months ago

            If liking communism is too much for communists then they might not be communists…

            • @pleasemakesense@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              -811 months ago

              Everyone has limits, for some it’s concentration camps. It’s not something tribal where you have to support someone because they call themself communists. You can agree in principle but not in execution

              • @CannotSleep420
                link
                1511 months ago

                I think the general consensus on this instance is that the actual execution isn’t the attrocity horror show that so many make it out to be: that capitalist dominance of media and education has either ridiculously distorted or outright fabricated many of the atrocities attributed to AES. This doesn’t mean people here like/support AES uncritically or unconditionally. However, the criticisms that will be levied against states/orgs here are going to be quite different from those of the more “libertarian” left.

                • @pleasemakesense@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -611 months ago

                  I guess we disagree on that, I see no reason to make out some communist countries as hellholes (DPRK) while others like Cuba get a free pass. Other than that I consider DPRK leadership as more of a personal cult disguised with a communist state, and why communists would be compelled to defend that kind of stratification of society is beyond me

                  • @ImOnADietOP
                    link
                    7
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    to be perfectly honest, I don’t even know why we comment on dprk. It’s extremely hard to know anything accurate about them, our 2 main sources are defectors paid off by South Korea or state propganda, which I have literally no way to tell is truthful or not (there’s also defectors who say they want to go back, but tbh I don’t really trust any anecdote).

                    Western media constantly makes up the most outlandish things about them (everyone has to get the same haircut or they and 3 generations of their family get sent to gulag!?!?!), and ultimately they aren’t a big player in global affairs, so I just don’t really get the point of having arguments about them. Let’s end the sanctions, and let north korean communists deal with their own problems (whether that’s using the state or not).

                • @pleasemakesense@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -111 months ago

                  I’m mostly talking about the ones in DPRK. The claimed Chinese ones are more like culture erasure camps, I don’t know how you guys feel about those

                  • commiespammer
                    link
                    711 months ago

                    They’re goddam schools. Also what “camps” in the DPRK? give source?

                  • @m532
                    link
                    111 months ago

                    Where did you hear that bullshit?

              • @CriticalResist8A
                link
                411 months ago

                Why bring concentration camps in this conversation?

                  • @CriticalResist8A
                    link
                    611 months ago

                    That the Nazis sent people to concentration camps? I would hope nobody here denies that.

          • @CriticalResist8A
            link
            11
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Between 75 and 90% of our users are a minority in some way: either in gender or sexual identity, skin colour or religion.

            They have no problem liking the DPRK and CPC.

            Beehaw isn’t even on the left, I’m not sure what you think communists are. They’re the well-intentioned liberals MLK was talking about.

            • @Prologue7642
              link
              311 months ago

              I would be really interested if those are actual numbers. It seems like a bit too high, but shame there is basically no way to know for sure without some privacy issues.

              • @CriticalResist8A
                link
                911 months ago

                We’ve never ran a website survey exactly for the privacy reason, but based on the active users on the site as well as account request answers, the very least amount of minorities on Lemmygrad is 50% of users. 75 seems more realistic though.

                • @redtea
                  link
                  611 months ago

                  Anecdotally, it feels that way. It’s one of the great things about this place.

            • @pleasemakesense@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              -111 months ago

              That makes it even more weird, given the DPRK’s stance on sexual identity and religion. Don’t know any branch of communism that is particularly fond of religion. I don’t come from beehaw, I don’t know what they’re about.

              • @CriticalResist8A
                link
                611 months ago

                What stances against religion? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chondoist_Chongu_Party

                What stances on sexual identity? https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_and_issues_in_AES_countries#Democratic_People’s_Republic_of_Korea

                Don’t know any branch of communism that is particularly fond of religion

                Liberation Theory and Islamic Socialism (of which we have a community here), and that doesn’t even go into the importance of religion in national liberation struggles.

                • @pleasemakesense@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -511 months ago

                  "However, the situation for the party soon turned difficult. Large sections of the Soviet and North Korean communist leaderships did not trust the party, and saw it as a potential nest for counterrevolutionaries. The most troublesome issue was that the North Korean Ch’ŏndogyo continued to have contacts with the leadership of the religious group in South Korean Seoul. There, the Ch’ŏndogyo leadership was anti-communist and supported the administration of President Syngman Rhee. In January 1948, the Ch’ŏndogyo leadership based in Seoul made a decision that a massive anti-communist demonstration would be held on 1 March in Pyongyang. This put the Chondist Chongu Party in the North in a precarious situation. Kim Tarhyon refused to follow the orders from Seoul, but others in the party leadership wanted to go ahead with the plans. The result was a massive purge of party members throughout North Korea. In its aftermath, the anti-communist sections of the movement initiated an underground resistance movement and tried to launch guerrilla warfare.

                  Kim Tarhyon and the people around him reaffirmed their loyalty to the DPRK. In 1950 the Chondoist Chongu Party in the South (but not the religious movement) united with the Northern party under his leadership. During the Korean War the headquarters of the party was shifted to a town near the border with China. The party leadership actively supported the DPRK war efforts, but many party cadres migrated to South Korea during the war. Many sided with Seoul during the war. In the aftermath of the war, the idea of the united front was increasingly unpopular in the North Korean government circles and many wanted the non-communist parties banned. In the end the united front was maintained, but the possibility for the Chondoist Chongu Party to conduct political activity was severely curtailed.

                  In 1954 the government subsidies to the party were cancelled. By 1956 there were approximately 1,700–3,000 members left (out of 10,000–50,000 remaining Ch’ŏndogyo believers). At the same time about 200 persons were full-time employees of the party. In order to finance the party, it ran an iron foundry and a printing house."

                  Pretty funny from your link

          • @redtea
            link
            511 months ago

            You’ve got to shake it in the Juche symbol or it doesn’t work.

    • @ImOnADietOP
      link
      511 months ago

      yeah… I just wish they could block us from commenting on their instance without keeping their users from seeing our comments on like lemmy