• Makan ☭ CPUSA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What split are you referring to?

    PCUSA literally has PatSocs in their organization.

    • cfgaussianOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Again, i don’t feel like this sort of thing is productive. I’m sure that PCUSA has its issues and people with problematic views. By the same token there are probably people on their side who will say that CPUSA has too many radlibs in their organization. The name calling by both sides can go on all day and what good does that do? That just stops any real work from getting done and in the end those who benefit are the feds whose wrecking work is being done for them.

      We need to stop being so dogmatic if we want to have a chance to actually succeed in building a mass movement. That does not mean compromising our principles but it does mean knowing how to pick our battles. Which are the primary contradictions and which are secondary for the time being?

        • cfgaussianOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Correct. These are just two examples. I personally don’t have much faith in the ability of any current communist party in the imperial core to be the vanguard of the revolution, but at least they’re doing stuff. Doing something is still better than doing nothing. And since my expectations of them are not particularly high i am also not too bothered by their various flaws. So long as they keep organizing, agitating, and educating instead of wasting their energy and time on fighting with other leftist groups.

          That is what annoys me the most about Maoists and Trotskyists, it’s not that they are ideologically wrong (which they are) it’s that they act like wreckers and often seem to be more hostile to other communists than to the bourgeoisie and the reactionaries.