Two psychoanalysis tests, one at the end of 12th grade school, and one around 45-50 years of age (this age should be determined more accurately using research and past criminal records of pedophiles).
Tests are mandatory to clear otherwise, depending on questions wrongly answered and the score you get, various consequences like being subjected to heavy monitoring in public areas, or interrogation by authorities, or taken in custody or taken in asylum for treatment.
False positives be used further to refine above procedure, and they be given some form of token/ID that certifies them to get extra immunity against future possible interrogations or being suspected in criminal cases, plus further perks like such ID/token carrying an approval mark to give them higher precedence than rest of society when getting work job in public/private sector.
Those found guilty in behavioural patterns by asylum jurisdiction be divided into several strata, depending on severity, and treated accordingly, and those found guilty by committing crime, be isolated from society for a non-bailable minimum of 25-30 years or more, where punishment can go upto death.
The procedure should resemble something like this, and be fortified further depending on research results and whatever data we currently have from society.
This system can be run over 50-100 years in society, depending on if 1 or 2 generations of people go through this process. And since there is almost no digital involvement in the process, and false positives get more precedence in society, people will accept consequences with lesser confrontation.
Okay, so from what I gather you do support the solution of psychiatric treatment and rehabilitation of non-offending (have not committed sexual crimes) people with pedophilic tendencies? Mandatory medical treatment and rehab for non-offending pedophiles is something I have no problems with. And as I’ve said agree with physical sexual offenses being punished harshly so yeah (involving minors or not it should be punished harshly, but obviously sexual abuse of a minor should be more so). Now that you actually laid out your stance I no longer think it’s massively problematic like I previously assumed.
Two psychoanalysis tests, one at the end of 12th grade school, and one around 45-50 years of age (this age should be determined more accurately using research and past criminal records of pedophiles).
Tests are mandatory to clear otherwise, depending on questions wrongly answered and the score you get, various consequences like being subjected to heavy monitoring in public areas, or interrogation by authorities, or taken in custody or taken in asylum for treatment.
False positives be used further to refine above procedure, and they be given some form of token/ID that certifies them to get extra immunity against future possible interrogations or being suspected in criminal cases, plus further perks like such ID/token carrying an approval mark to give them higher precedence than rest of society when getting work job in public/private sector.
Those found guilty in behavioural patterns by asylum jurisdiction be divided into several strata, depending on severity, and treated accordingly, and those found guilty by committing crime, be isolated from society for a non-bailable minimum of 25-30 years or more, where punishment can go upto death.
The procedure should resemble something like this, and be fortified further depending on research results and whatever data we currently have from society.
This system can be run over 50-100 years in society, depending on if 1 or 2 generations of people go through this process. And since there is almost no digital involvement in the process, and false positives get more precedence in society, people will accept consequences with lesser confrontation.
Okay, so from what I gather you do support the solution of psychiatric treatment and rehabilitation of non-offending (have not committed sexual crimes) people with pedophilic tendencies? Mandatory medical treatment and rehab for non-offending pedophiles is something I have no problems with. And as I’ve said agree with physical sexual offenses being punished harshly so yeah (involving minors or not it should be punished harshly, but obviously sexual abuse of a minor should be more so). Now that you actually laid out your stance I no longer think it’s massively problematic like I previously assumed.