I don’t see this kneejerk hot take reaction you’re talking about, and Fennekin sort of just assumed in their text that people would call them a pedophile enabler for taking the frankly rather acceptable stance they did.
I want to encourage you both to engage in good faith and assume the same from others here rather than begin assuming the worst out of people. The GZD discord is unbearable because everyone assumes bad faith from everyone else and thus everything is always horribly tense and un-comradely. It doesn’t have to be like that, and I would consider ‘reddit style’ behavior more congruent with assuming the worst out of people and twisting their words.
I think there is also a delicate balance of interplaying factors at work here - many of the people publicly calling for the death of “pedos” themselves were abused as children, they’re not monsters. Most of them probably equate the terms “pedophile” and “child molester” to mean the same thing, as another comrade pointed out. It’s an ignorant and potentially dangerous miscommunication that can deter pedophiles from getting help, but I think refusing to acknowledge the place that that anger comes from does a disservice to those who suffered the depravity of a child molester as well.
Fennekin sort of just assumed in their text that people would call them a pedophile enabler for taking the frankly rather acceptable stance they did.
I made thus comment before I read all the other comments, and you’re right, and I now can see that I might have been better off not putting snark in such a serious topic. I guess I’m just used to reading this discussion on Reddit, where yeah, everyone’s like “if someone even looks at a child for longer than they need to they should be drawn and quartered” and god forbid you actually point out problems with this (yet ironically, Reddit seems to have no problem with l*licon and other fictional CP, why?!) Actually pleasently surprised that here it’s not the case and most people agree that non-offending pedophiles should be treated instead.
I apologize if my comment seemed snarky or accusative or anything. I think most of the convo here has been useful and balanced, and I think it usually is. Even when a comrade presents an extreme overexaggeration of their beliefs, it’s often made in a fit of anger or annoyance, and when actually talked to I think that the realities of their views tend to look a lot like mine/ours, or they’re just not educated enough on the topic and are receptive to discussion. Usually.
Just not like reddit at all, at least in my experience, excepting trolls. On reddit, any time I made a post I felt prickly, the armor has to go up beforehand because I know no matter what I say the comments will be flooded with bad faith actors. Usually doesn’t feel that way here and I appreciate that.
I don’t see this kneejerk hot take reaction you’re talking about, and Fennekin sort of just assumed in their text that people would call them a pedophile enabler for taking the frankly rather acceptable stance they did.
I want to encourage you both to engage in good faith and assume the same from others here rather than begin assuming the worst out of people. The GZD discord is unbearable because everyone assumes bad faith from everyone else and thus everything is always horribly tense and un-comradely. It doesn’t have to be like that, and I would consider ‘reddit style’ behavior more congruent with assuming the worst out of people and twisting their words.
I think there is also a delicate balance of interplaying factors at work here - many of the people publicly calling for the death of “pedos” themselves were abused as children, they’re not monsters. Most of them probably equate the terms “pedophile” and “child molester” to mean the same thing, as another comrade pointed out. It’s an ignorant and potentially dangerous miscommunication that can deter pedophiles from getting help, but I think refusing to acknowledge the place that that anger comes from does a disservice to those who suffered the depravity of a child molester as well.
I’d assume she’s referring to the post title
I made thus comment before I read all the other comments, and you’re right, and I now can see that I might have been better off not putting snark in such a serious topic. I guess I’m just used to reading this discussion on Reddit, where yeah, everyone’s like “if someone even looks at a child for longer than they need to they should be drawn and quartered” and god forbid you actually point out problems with this (yet ironically, Reddit seems to have no problem with l*licon and other fictional CP, why?!) Actually pleasently surprised that here it’s not the case and most people agree that non-offending pedophiles should be treated instead.
I apologize if my comment seemed snarky or accusative or anything. I think most of the convo here has been useful and balanced, and I think it usually is. Even when a comrade presents an extreme overexaggeration of their beliefs, it’s often made in a fit of anger or annoyance, and when actually talked to I think that the realities of their views tend to look a lot like mine/ours, or they’re just not educated enough on the topic and are receptive to discussion. Usually.
Just not like reddit at all, at least in my experience, excepting trolls. On reddit, any time I made a post I felt prickly, the armor has to go up beforehand because I know no matter what I say the comments will be flooded with bad faith actors. Usually doesn’t feel that way here and I appreciate that.