• الأرض ستبقى عربية
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yet, the US is in complete lockstep defending Israel, regardless of which party voted in and regardless of which International law Israel is violating.

    Honest question, do you know that you are lying? The connection between US financial, military and political support and Israeli crimes against Palestinians is clear to the whole world.

    • ex10n@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      The US supports a 2 state solution and provisions for humanitarian aid due to the atrocities committed by both Hamas and the IDF. The US favors peace and stability.

      • الأرض ستبقى عربية
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        If the US ever favoured peace and stability it would have had the 2-state solution done in the 1990s. The US always wanted the conflict to be a managed conflict, but never ending.

        • ex10n@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          While the US has its stated policy, it cannot interfere with sovereign authority without unilateral justification. A 2 state solution needs agreement from Palestinians and Israelis alike. I truly hope this can come to fruition to end the needless loss of life.

          • SexMachineStalin [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            So why did Joe Bellend and Obomba overthrow a democratically elected Yakunovich 10 years ago? Or joined up with france-cool in Lybia? Or propped up ISIS over a decade ago and try to overthrow Assad, creating a refugee crisis? Or attempt a failed coup in Xinjiang? Or hell, even in December of 2019 overthrow MAS in Bolivia? Just a few recent examples.

            Sure as shit sounds like anything except “interfering with sovereign authority without unilateral justification”.