• JucheBot1988
    link
    111 year ago

    That makes sense. One can think of him too as a bonapartist – I believe Zyuganov described him that way back in 2000 – but of a peculiar sort: one whose government arose not from an established capitalist state in decay, but from a failed comprador regime that replaced a genuine socialist government. Hence he inherits, at the very least, the geopolitical position of the USSR vis-a-vis America and the west.