Just saw this report from a few days ago and in all honesty it doesn’t look good. I hope I am misinterpreting it.

Unless insanely drastic measures are taken in the next 8 years we’ll overshoot the 2°C warming, never mind the 1.5°C.

“But with COP27 looming, only a couple of dozen have done so and the new pledges would shave just 1% off emissions in 2030. Global emissions must fall by almost 50% by that date to keep the 1.5C target alive.”

The linked graph in the article is staggering showing how little our existing pledges are going to put a dent in that number. Our current policies will put us anywhere from 2.6-2.8°C of warming.

https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2022

  • loathesome dongeater
    link
    42 years ago

    Life will definitely survive one way or another. The point is however is to try and minimise ecological damage.

    • @DeHuq2
      link
      6
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I honestly doubt thats feasible at this point. Its would take a miracle for the entire world to suddenly have a change of heart and make a legitimate effort to curb the pollution before ecological situation becomes too dire to ignore. Either way there’s a sort of a doomerist hope that even if everything goes down the shitter, wildlife will persevere and call this plastic-ridden landscape their home and use it to their advantage

      • loathesome dongeater
        link
        42 years ago

        some degree of minimisation is always possible. it ain’t much but it’s honest work kind of vibe.

      • Catradora-Stalinism☭
        link
        32 years ago

        The destruction of the west’s industry, especially if some go fascist, is a viable option