• ☭ 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗘𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 ☭A
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    To me, “all means necessary” implies that we’d be willing to do all kinds of disgusting shit if it has a slight chance of helping the revolution. Violence is obviously unavoidable, but it’s not like killing or torturing someone whom we suspect to be acting against proletarian interests will be our first choice. We’re not going to go around killing every passive anticommunist we see just because they’re not currently on our side

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, this is what i meant in my previous answer to you - they don’t think so. Or rather, they are already accustomed by the liberal media to think of revolutionaries as violent monsters wanting to literally pay eye for an eye for millenia of opression (note - they do know there is a lot to paid for), mostly because the idea of lex talionis is so popular among the conservatives which they are in a nutshell.

      Just go watch any video about Che Guevara on the Youtube for an example of that thinking, and how widespread it is on the right and western left (Hakim posted great commentary about this just yesterday).