The unchallenged assumption among the majority of senior U.S. and NATO officials is that for as long as the war between Russia and Ukraine continues, one of the West’s most preferred policy outcomes of the war will be perpetually met: weakening Russia. Going unnoticed by most Western leaders, however, there is an emerging risk that […]
Lol, unimaginable? Can anyone imagine a country the size of Ukraine defeating a country the size of Russia?
apparently a lot of western liberals can, I guess that’s what happens when you get your education exclusively from reading harry potter
Once you huff enough corporate media you can imagine anything they say.
Vietnam beat the US, not really the soundest argument.
Vietnam had a righteous cause to fight for. Ukraine meanwhile is fighting to be a fascist puppet of the USA.
No doubt, just pointing out that:
“It’s not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog.”
Vietnam doesn’t share a land border with the USA nor were they fighting a conventional war.
Neither was Iraq though. Yet they managed to destroy it nonetheless. Either way It’s more complex than the size of the countries involved, especially in modern warfare.
The US’s goal was to occupy the country, annex its natural resources, and rebuild the country with private contractors. These are not the goals of Russia in Ukraine
Nicholas 2 and Russo-Japanese war. Different situation, I know
By that logic, Russia should have annexed Ukraine by now.
Russia isn’t trying to annex Ukraine.
By that logic, Ukraine should’ve taken back Crimea…