🏴☠️#USEmpire 🍔🦠#USA
WARNING 18+ Adult content & US racism.
Perhaps the most depraved, racist & disgusting thing we have ever reported:
Sick Americans are making porn based on the US government & ETIM claim of genocide & concentration camps in Xinjiang, China.
Nothing more needs saying from us, just look at this degenerate crap.
🥭@mangopress
and what are you then? a fascist? because lets not forget that the purity-principle (part of which is the institutional sovereignty over womens bodies) is at the core of catholic fascism. do you think all people went to work sober in the soviet union or that there were even much reprisals against being drunk at work? do you think there was no prostitution? i beg to differ…
so why this exclusionary love for alcohol but condemnation of other means of self medication?
It stems from the same cultural religious encoding that tells us that female sexuality and the power it holds is dangerous or sinful?
drug prohibition was driven by fascists and christians and usually for purely for a mixture of racism and profit motives (also to keep their monopolies - see dupont / Nylon in particular) and so is the shaming of women using their sexuality for profit - Prostitution (legal, regulated…) is labour and as such deserves representation. So how about you attack the porn moguls of san fernando rather than the probably oldest exchange of goods in history?
Hearing a “comrade” talk this way about the sex trade makes me suicidal lmao. There’s no fucking hope if “educated communists” will spew this type of shit. Goodbye.
framing the other argument like this makes me worried that you are not led by arguments but by outrage over something which you do not relate to as it has people in it which you don’t want to relate to. very communist of you, truly…
triggering? wtf? why?
maybe you should take that emotional discomfort/cognitive dissonance towards arguments that make you feel strange as a learning moment. but okay. you do you…
pornography/prostitution in and by themselves are not “sexual violence” and yes, sexual violence is bad and needs to be fought. totally agree, but you cannot conflate them. it’s like homophobes conflate lgbtq people with pedophiles. doesn’t give justice to the issue at hand or to the larger class of participants.
(sexual) exploitation and violence in both, prostitution and pornography need to be fought, in this we are comrades. but i m not fighting concepts like prostitution or pornography themselves, that would be somewhere between utopian stalinism and medieval catholic fascism, at least way too authoritarian for it to not create enormous amounts of suffering. way beyound what legalized and regulated prostitution could bring.
is the market exploiting its participants? does it create toxic behaviour and exploitation? then crack down on it where it happens. that is market regulation and a function of the state. and has nothing to do with abstract constructs one declares enemy like DonQuixote attacked windmills in his illusion of grandeur. Because honestly, the DonQuixote spirit, i can sense this shit miles away from here. idealistic it may be, but not constructive imho
Let’s try discussing this another day. I genuinely can’t give you anything more productive than a bunch of insults. You make the effort to read Marxist feminists opinions on this. Stop assuming it has anything to do with puritanism, I’ll stop assuming you love sexual violence.
i don’t love sexual violence and neither do i think you wanna crack down on some fragment of poor single mothers (side) hustle or its non-violent customers. or the dorks in their cellar jerking off (which they would do over ceramic depictions of thicc ladies, historically…). crack down on the pornhub owners for their theft and abuse of its platform users and its de facto monopolisation without representation - especially in BDSM porn industries -, or reducing incentives for predation of migrant women by allowing them to work and receive support, yes, i m all for that.
i think, the marxist thing is to see it as labour. labour needs regulation and representation against exploitation. and the more solidarity non-prostitutes have with prostitutes the better.
I mean, let’s start at the church, how about we give those swole apostles in the stages of the cross some proper t-shirts. isn’t that a form of soft sex pornography related to involuntary BDSM? And why do you think those poor farmers wives loved to sit at the church and look at these images and the jacked white hippie jesus on the cross looking all empathic and with white skin, clean hands, unlike their earth shoveling, cow milking, pig-slaughtering husbands… … to whom they were largely (forcibly) married because of economic and generational interdependencies
and what are you then? a fascist? because lets not forget that the purity-principle (part of which is the institutional sovereignty over womens bodies) is at the core of catholic fascism. do you think all people went to work sober in the soviet union or that there were even much reprisals against being drunk at work? do you think there was no prostitution? i beg to differ…
so why this exclusionary love for alcohol but condemnation of other means of self medication? It stems from the same cultural religious encoding that tells us that female sexuality and the power it holds is dangerous or sinful?
drug prohibition was driven by fascists and christians and usually for purely for a mixture of racism and profit motives (also to keep their monopolies - see dupont / Nylon in particular) and so is the shaming of women using their sexuality for profit - Prostitution (legal, regulated…) is labour and as such deserves representation. So how about you attack the porn moguls of san fernando rather than the probably oldest exchange of goods in history?
What the fuck are you talking about
Hearing a “comrade” talk this way about the sex trade makes me suicidal lmao. There’s no fucking hope if “educated communists” will spew this type of shit. Goodbye.
framing the other argument like this makes me worried that you are not led by arguments but by outrage over something which you do not relate to as it has people in it which you don’t want to relate to. very communist of you, truly…
Oh my god. Shut the fuck up. I’m not interested in discussing a topic that is highly triggering on a fucking public internet forum. Again, goodbye.
triggering? wtf? why? maybe you should take that emotional discomfort/cognitive dissonance towards arguments that make you feel strange as a learning moment. but okay. you do you…
Sexual violence is a very common trigger. I have long since learned that sexual violence is defended in many spaces.
I don’t feel “strange”, the fuck is wrong with you.
pornography/prostitution in and by themselves are not “sexual violence” and yes, sexual violence is bad and needs to be fought. totally agree, but you cannot conflate them. it’s like homophobes conflate lgbtq people with pedophiles. doesn’t give justice to the issue at hand or to the larger class of participants.
(sexual) exploitation and violence in both, prostitution and pornography need to be fought, in this we are comrades. but i m not fighting concepts like prostitution or pornography themselves, that would be somewhere between utopian stalinism and medieval catholic fascism, at least way too authoritarian for it to not create enormous amounts of suffering. way beyound what legalized and regulated prostitution could bring.
is the market exploiting its participants? does it create toxic behaviour and exploitation? then crack down on it where it happens. that is market regulation and a function of the state. and has nothing to do with abstract constructs one declares enemy like DonQuixote attacked windmills in his illusion of grandeur. Because honestly, the DonQuixote spirit, i can sense this shit miles away from here. idealistic it may be, but not constructive imho
Let’s try discussing this another day. I genuinely can’t give you anything more productive than a bunch of insults. You make the effort to read Marxist feminists opinions on this. Stop assuming it has anything to do with puritanism, I’ll stop assuming you love sexual violence.
i don’t love sexual violence and neither do i think you wanna crack down on some fragment of poor single mothers (side) hustle or its non-violent customers. or the dorks in their cellar jerking off (which they would do over ceramic depictions of thicc ladies, historically…). crack down on the pornhub owners for their theft and abuse of its platform users and its de facto monopolisation without representation - especially in BDSM porn industries -, or reducing incentives for predation of migrant women by allowing them to work and receive support, yes, i m all for that.
i think, the marxist thing is to see it as labour. labour needs regulation and representation against exploitation. and the more solidarity non-prostitutes have with prostitutes the better.
I mean, let’s start at the church, how about we give those swole apostles in the stages of the cross some proper t-shirts. isn’t that a form of soft sex pornography related to involuntary BDSM? And why do you think those poor farmers wives loved to sit at the church and look at these images and the jacked white hippie jesus on the cross looking all empathic and with white skin, clean hands, unlike their earth shoveling, cow milking, pig-slaughtering husbands… … to whom they were largely (forcibly) married because of economic and generational interdependencies