I have a question.

  • 小莱卡
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    The marxist analysis of history is called historical materialism (Stalin has THE book on this), it boils down to the “history of hitherto society is the history of the development of the means of production”.

    A basic example: In primitive societies, everyone had to work to survive, 10 hunters provided the food for 10 people. As the tools of hunting evolved (the bow being the paradigm shifter) a single hunter could now provide for 10 people, freeing up those people to do other work, hence making the old structure of society completely obsolete.

    This is how systems die and get replaced. At one point capitalism replaced feudalism (read theory), eventually communism will replace capitalism it is inevitable tho it doesn’t mean that the old system will go down peacefully as they have never gone peacefully.

    If you ask me, the capitalist class became obsolete as the production of tools used for education and distribution (books and especially computers and the internet) became sufficiently capable. We just haven’t replaced it yet.

    • TokenBoomer@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you ask me, the capitalist class became obsolete as the production of tools used for education and distribution (books and especially computers and the internet) became sufficiently capable. We just haven’t replaced it yet.

      That is an interesting idea to think on. When the proletariat have the means to educate themselves, the bourgeoisie becomes irrelevant. It seems AI and advancements in 3d printing will accelerate this.

      • Catradora-Stalinism☭
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Especially since so many of these advancements will now be reduced to fill a profit motive, when they could be used to better wider society in a far better fashion.