• relay
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    8 Nuking the world because you can’t get everything you want and won’t learn from your mistakes is unbelievably childish behavior. Can an individual be like that, yes. However the chain of giving orders goes through many people and I hope some of them have the sense not to destroy the planet. I’m pretty sure that anyone that wants anything in their life requires the lack of a nuclear war.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In case of every single other country, even India and UK i would believe that no problem. But look what US does currently, getting closer into two WW3 opportunities simultaneously, not to mention knowingly fucking up the planet itself. They did intentionally made it harder, but if entire fish is rotten…

      Karl Marx wrote in Das Kapital (Vol. 1, Part III, Chapter Ten, Section 5) “Après moi, le déluge!” is the watchword of every capitalist and of every capitalist nation. Hence Capital is reckless of the health or length of life of the labourer, unless under compulsion from society."

      • relay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there anything you can really do to prevent nuclear war? is there anything you can do to prepare for nuclear war? I don’t think there is much that can be done. Maybe a state agency anonymously finds some manner to disable the Uncle Sam’s ability to initiate an apocalypse enough times to make it functionally impossible. The possibility exists for it to not occur, so we can act as if it won’t happen.

        If you are a Posadist that thinks that we can establish socialist relations after the nuclear apocalypse, I guess you can have fun living in a bunker praying for a disaster that may never come like a doomsday cult.

        The United States’ inability to acknowlege reality will convince them to make tactical blunders in their own hubris.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Is there anything you can really do to prevent nuclear war?

          If nuclear power goes unhined enough to press button out of “apres mois, le deluge”? Absolutely nothing. First strike wont work because US have significant second strike ability. They have 450 land based ICBM’s launch sites and 14 ICBM armed submarine, this is basically not possible to neutralise unilaterally by any means.

          The United States’ inability to acknowlege reality will convince them to make tactical blunders in their own hubris.

          They are already doing it, and as their position worsens, those blunders have increasing consequences, like the Ukraine War activating the spiral of dedollarisation. So that’s positive since it will bury them eventually, i just fear the last blunder might be nuclear and it will bury us all.

    • Catradora-Stalinism☭M
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would believe this if it wasn’t for how many times the US almost started a nuclear war randomly before like one dude stopped them

      • relay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is the safeguard system working as intended.

        • Orcocracy [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          No it’s just fucking luck. Think about those people in air conditioned offices controlling the drone strikes that double-tapped weddings in Iraq and Afghanistan with their Xbox controller while watching it all on live video. How many of them are sitting in front of the nuclear button, just waiting for the order?