Red_Scare [he/him]

  • 47 Posts
  • 621 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 19th, 2020

help-circle

  • Red_Scare [he/him]toMemesSolarpunk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’m just answering a poster saying anarchism is a lot like democratic centralism. Some parts are similar (delegation and recall), others are not at all (vanguard party, dotp)



  • Red_Scare [he/him]toMemesSolarpunk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    how do you expect to protect your revolution with no vanguard or DoTP?

    This is literally what I wrote in my first comment:

    My disagreement with anarchism is different: I think only a state with a strong coercive apparatus can survive sustained imperial pressure and capitalist encirclement.





  • Red_Scare [he/him]toMemesSolarpunk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    12 days ago

    You can call a federation of communes a “state” if you want. Anarchists are not against this kind of “state”. As long as power flows bottom-up by delegation and recall.


  • Red_Scare [he/him]toMemesSolarpunk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’m not an anarchist, but a lot of people here are misrepresenting anarchism. Anarchists don’t reject coordination or planning, only hierarchical state control. Large infrastructure would be built by federated councils, unions, and communes, with common plans and technical bodies coordinated by accountable, recallable delegates. Central coordination without a state hierarchy is entirely possible.

    My disagreement with anarchism is different: I think only a state with a strong coercive apparatus can survive sustained imperial pressure and capitalist encirclement.