This part of the speech starts at the timestamp 6:30

  • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s funny putting weird ideological stuff like this in your speech when you invite a bunch of capitalist countries.

    • cfgaussianM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s a chad flex. The capitalists have to sit there quietly and listen to him praise Marxism-Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought.

    • Envylike
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s the point of Chinese diplomacy - respect their sovereignty while using dialogue, trade, and economic influence to promote your political ideology. No coups, no invasions, no policing the world, just leading by example. Now, I am under no illusion that capitalist leaders are gonna have a change of heart and become communists. They won’t listen, but their people will. And that’s the point. People in this country will one day have a realization - “that’s the civilized world, that’s how diplomacy is done, that’s how you run a society and an economy - by the people, for the people, and we can have that for ourselves too”, which is exactly what the PRC is planning for.

      • Aria
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Except this speech will be overshadowed by how they served Taiwanese Uighur-Tibetan-liver at the event. It’s already being overshadowed by Xi and Putin discussing necromancy. https://lemmygrad.ml/post/9008185

        You can’t lead by example if no one can see your example.

        • -6-6-6-
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Taiwanese

          Don’t care about fascist remnant governments. I literally could care less when they are more brutal to their people than the CPC ever was. Hopefully their government does what is best for their people and surrenders unconditionally to the Chinese mainland.

          Uighur

          Still parroting the U.S state department narrative that was adopted from the fucking actual lunatic Adrian Zens? Cool. https://www.reddit.com/r/TheDeprogram/wiki/index/debunking/uyghur-genocide

          Tibet

          I feel no sympathy for religious theocratic governments that had religious slaves. People of Tibet are freer now then they ever were under religious dogma.

          liver

          What?

          Slightly unserious, here.

          • techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think Aria means that the bourgeois states will spread propaganda to their people and no one will hear Xi’s speech. I don’t think they think that China did any of that

            • -6-6-6-
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              When I made this comment, multiple other people had responded being mildly confused and even questioning you on it. Upon seeing this now, I apologize.

              Yeah, that makes more sense. There was multiple comments when I first made this questioning it with none of Aria’s replies yet. Didn’t see any of those upon making this comment.

          • cfgaussianM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think the person you are responding to was making a joke.

            • -6-6-6-
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              When I made this comment, multiple other people had responded being mildly confused and even questioning you on it. Upon seeing this now, I apologize.

              Yeah, I realize that now. Gonna keep it up because I’m not a fan of deleting content but I wasn’t aware as there wasn’t any replies from Aria at the time. My bad.

              • cfgaussianM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                To be fair, it can be hard to recognize sarcasm in written form sometimes. That’s why we have /s. Perhaps the OP should have used it.

                • -6-6-6-
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  They mentioned they weren’t being satirical. Now I’m confused.

            • -6-6-6-
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              When I made this comment, multiple other people had responded being mildly confused and even questioning you on it. Upon seeing this now, I apologize. The slightly unserious part I was referencing to what I thought was a remark on “chinese organ-trafficking” with the “liver” part.

              Fucking A+ tier satire. God damn.

              • Aria
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                I wasn’t being satirical, it is my honest concern. I just used an outlandish example of a counter narrative because it barely matters how stupid the counter-narrative is.

                China’s ability to tell their own story and have that heard is far weaker than the west’s, even measured against the fraction of the west’s narrative that is specifically focused on labelling China. It’s not a problem that’ll be fixed quickly.

                (I don’t want to downplay progress either, China’s image in the global south has improved recently, but that doesn’t mean that global south residents are going to disbelieve specific allegations they hear from western sources).

                • -6-6-6-
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Your honest opinion strangely matches up with concerns of the U.S State Department.

                  • Aria
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    In the inverse. The U.S. State Department is concerned they’re gaining back soft power too quickly.

        • rainpizzaOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          In May 26 2025, a Chinese research team has successfully grown five types of bioartificial organs, including the liver, heart, kidneys, lungs, and skin, in petri dishes using cell culture and 3D printing technologies. So… China doesn’t need organ trafficking as you conspiracy theorist suggest. Source(1, 2)

          Oh, btw, the US is the one that destroys countries like Haiti and turns them into massive organ trafficking regions:

          On July 2, Ghada Fathi Waly, Executive Director of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), told the UN Security Council briefing about Haiti that alarming reports increasingly point to human trafficking for organ removal targeting women and children in Haiti. She cited a police raid in May on a medical facility in Pétion-Ville suspected of involvement in illicit organ trade and highlighted reports of organ removal surfacing in a northern hospital. Waly called for “urgent, impartial, and transparent investigations” and accountability for any complicit medical institutions.

          Don’t project the vile empire’s cruelty on to China.

          • Aria
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Does my comment read as if I believed organ harvesting to be real? It’s a commonly repeated talking point from liberals.

            • rainpizzaOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              6 months ago

              Sadly, yes. If possible, could you edit this to avoid more misunderstandings?

              Except this speech will be overshadowed by how they served Taiwanese Uighur-Tibetan-liver at the event.

              • Aria
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                You’re being silly. The implication is that there’s a sizeable population of people with both Uighur and Tibetan recent ancestry who live on Taiwan.

                • Malkhodr
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I didn’t get that impression at all myself truthfully, but I may just be bad at reading context.

      • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Most governments don’t really mention ideological stuff when they have foreign guests I would assume. I feel like he usually says this stuff in the CPC anniversary speeches. Maybe he did it at the last military parade too but idk. But I guess the CPC does stress the importance of keeping the military political.