For more:https://news.cgtn.com/news/2025-09-03/Xi-Jinping-delivers-important-speech-at-V-Day-commemoration-1GmnOdeMNz2/p.htmlXi Jinping, general secretary o...
This part of the speech starts at the timestamp 6:30
That’s the point of Chinese diplomacy - respect their sovereignty while using dialogue, trade, and economic influence to promote your political ideology. No coups, no invasions, no policing the world, just leading by example. Now, I am under no illusion that capitalist leaders are gonna have a change of heart and become communists. They won’t listen, but their people will. And that’s the point. People in this country will one day have a realization - “that’s the civilized world, that’s how diplomacy is done, that’s how you run a society and an economy - by the people, for the people, and we can have that for ourselves too”, which is exactly what the PRC is planning for.
Except this speech will be overshadowed by how they served Taiwanese Uighur-Tibetan-liver at the event. It’s already being overshadowed by Xi and Putin discussing necromancy. https://lemmygrad.ml/post/9008185
You can’t lead by example if no one can see your example.
Don’t care about fascist remnant governments. I literally could care less when they are more brutal to their people than the CPC ever was. Hopefully their government does what is best for their people and surrenders unconditionally to the Chinese mainland.
I feel no sympathy for religious theocratic governments that had religious slaves. People of Tibet are freer now then they ever were under religious dogma.
I think Aria means that the bourgeois states will spread propaganda to their people and no one will hear Xi’s speech. I don’t think they think that China did any of that
When I made this comment, multiple other people had responded being mildly confused and even questioning you on it. Upon seeing this now, I apologize.
Yeah, that makes more sense. There was multiple comments when I first made this questioning it with none of Aria’s replies yet. Didn’t see any of those upon making this comment.
When I made this comment, multiple other people had responded being mildly confused and even questioning you on it. Upon seeing this now, I apologize.
Yeah, I realize that now. Gonna keep it up because I’m not a fan of deleting content but I wasn’t aware as there wasn’t any replies from Aria at the time. My bad.
When I made this comment, multiple other people had responded being mildly confused and even questioning you on it. Upon seeing this now, I apologize. The slightly unserious part I was referencing to what I thought was a remark on “chinese organ-trafficking” with the “liver” part.
I wasn’t being satirical, it is my honest concern. I just used an outlandish example of a counter narrative because it barely matters how stupid the counter-narrative is.
China’s ability to tell their own story and have that heard is far weaker than the west’s, even measured against the fraction of the west’s narrative that is specifically focused on labelling China. It’s not a problem that’ll be fixed quickly.
(I don’t want to downplay progress either, China’s image in the global south has improved recently, but that doesn’t mean that global south residents are going to disbelieve specific allegations they hear from western sources).
In May 26 2025, a Chinese research team has successfully grown five types of bioartificial organs, including the liver, heart, kidneys, lungs, and skin, in petri dishes using cell culture and 3D printing technologies. So… China doesn’t need organ trafficking as you conspiracy theorist suggest. Source(1, 2)
Oh, btw, the US is the one that destroys countries like Haiti and turns them into massive organ trafficking regions:
That’s the point of Chinese diplomacy - respect their sovereignty while using dialogue, trade, and economic influence to promote your political ideology. No coups, no invasions, no policing the world, just leading by example. Now, I am under no illusion that capitalist leaders are gonna have a change of heart and become communists. They won’t listen, but their people will. And that’s the point. People in this country will one day have a realization - “that’s the civilized world, that’s how diplomacy is done, that’s how you run a society and an economy - by the people, for the people, and we can have that for ourselves too”, which is exactly what the PRC is planning for.
Except this speech will be overshadowed by how they served Taiwanese Uighur-Tibetan-liver at the event. It’s already being overshadowed by Xi and Putin discussing necromancy. https://lemmygrad.ml/post/9008185
You can’t lead by example if no one can see your example.
Don’t care about fascist remnant governments. I literally could care less when they are more brutal to their people than the CPC ever was. Hopefully their government does what is best for their people and surrenders unconditionally to the Chinese mainland.
Still parroting the U.S state department narrative that was adopted from the fucking actual lunatic Adrian Zens? Cool. https://www.reddit.com/r/TheDeprogram/wiki/index/debunking/uyghur-genocide
I feel no sympathy for religious theocratic governments that had religious slaves. People of Tibet are freer now then they ever were under religious dogma.
What?
Slightly unserious, here.
I think Aria means that the bourgeois states will spread propaganda to their people and no one will hear Xi’s speech. I don’t think they think that China did any of that
Yeah, that makes more sense. There was multiple comments when I first made this questioning it with none of Aria’s replies yet. Didn’t see any of those upon making this comment.
I think the person you are responding to was making a joke.
Yeah, I realize that now. Gonna keep it up because I’m not a fan of deleting content but I wasn’t aware as there wasn’t any replies from Aria at the time. My bad.
To be fair, it can be hard to recognize sarcasm in written form sometimes. That’s why we have /s. Perhaps the OP should have used it.
They mentioned they weren’t being satirical. Now I’m confused.
Brother…
When I made this comment, multiple other people had responded being mildly confused and even questioning you on it. Upon seeing this now, I apologize. The slightly unserious part I was referencing to what I thought was a remark on “chinese organ-trafficking” with the “liver” part.
Fucking A+ tier satire. God damn.
I wasn’t being satirical, it is my honest concern. I just used an outlandish example of a counter narrative because it barely matters how stupid the counter-narrative is.
China’s ability to tell their own story and have that heard is far weaker than the west’s, even measured against the fraction of the west’s narrative that is specifically focused on labelling China. It’s not a problem that’ll be fixed quickly.
(I don’t want to downplay progress either, China’s image in the global south has improved recently, but that doesn’t mean that global south residents are going to disbelieve specific allegations they hear from western sources).
Your honest opinion strangely matches up with concerns of the U.S State Department.
In the inverse. The U.S. State Department is concerned they’re gaining back soft power too quickly.
A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.
In May 26 2025, a Chinese research team has successfully grown five types of bioartificial organs, including the liver, heart, kidneys, lungs, and skin, in petri dishes using cell culture and 3D printing technologies. So… China doesn’t need organ trafficking as you conspiracy theorist suggest. Source(1, 2)
Oh, btw, the US is the one that destroys countries like Haiti and turns them into massive organ trafficking regions:
Don’t project the vile empire’s cruelty on to China.
Does my comment read as if I believed organ harvesting to be real? It’s a commonly repeated talking point from liberals.
Sadly, yes. If possible, could you edit this to avoid more misunderstandings?
You’re being silly. The implication is that there’s a sizeable population of people with both Uighur and Tibetan recent ancestry who live on Taiwan.
I didn’t get that impression at all myself truthfully, but I may just be bad at reading context.