Which one of them is supposed to be the “woke” and destroyed one, anyway? I genuinely can’t tell.
The one on the right looks very fine, I like her style of clothing. It looks like a frame from a movie or something, so maybe it’s not how she normally looks or dresses. The one on the left, I don’t like the style, but I wouldn’t consider her destroyed by any way. The worst I can say is that her face expression is clearly not genuine — but “smile and pretend you’re happy” seems very much to be a pressure engrained in American capitalist society for the last decades. Not in whatever “wokeness” is supposed to be.
(Now that I re-read my comment, I guess I’m over-thinking it… But I’m still lost trying to understand what is the point he tried to make)
Honestly the right one is a little more attractive personally, but I’m guessing they’re just doing the average reactionary talking point “short dark hair no smile on female=bad”
Which one of them is supposed to be the “woke” and destroyed one, anyway? I genuinely can’t tell.
The one on the right looks very fine, I like her style of clothing. It looks like a frame from a movie or something, so maybe it’s not how she normally looks or dresses. The one on the left, I don’t like the style, but I wouldn’t consider her destroyed by any way. The worst I can say is that her face expression is clearly not genuine — but “smile and pretend you’re happy” seems very much to be a pressure engrained in American capitalist society for the last decades. Not in whatever “wokeness” is supposed to be.
(Now that I re-read my comment, I guess I’m over-thinking it… But I’m still lost trying to understand what is the point he tried to make)
Honestly the right one is a little more attractive personally, but I’m guessing they’re just doing the average reactionary talking point “short dark hair no smile on female=bad”