• PolandIsAStateOfMind
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Are they admitting Spain and Italy are openly in the war against Russia?

    And specifically in the maritime context, week after they made huge fuss with screaming and crying and shitting themselves about international waters?

    • Shrike502
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Italy

      What are they gonna do, start expelling all those manors around Lake Como?

  • StugStig
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’ve heard people call the Pyotr Velikiy, a Kirov-class missile cruiser, a battlecruiser but never a battleship.

    It’s the size of a battleship. Like every modern ship however, its armor is only 100mm thick at most instead of the 650mm of the Yamato so it displaces a lot less even though it has to deal with the extra weight that nuclear propulsion comes with.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I noticed some media is using “battleships” just as the synonym for “warships” since battle-war seems very similar. Also there are no really consistent even international classification (not to mention historical) of warships. Cruisers, destroyers and frigates assigantion changes sometimes - with many modern destroyers being bigger than cruisers and frigate and destroyer being used kinda ambiguously. For example, US Arleigh Burke class destroyers or Chinese Type 055 destroyers are bigger than basically every other modern cruiser except Kirov-class.

    • Shrike502
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well I wouldn’t expect YouTubers who make such clickbait to be overly knowledgeable about ship designations. They might even call Admiral Kuznetsov something wacky, because it doesn’t fit the NATO classification