- cross-posted to:
- chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
- cross-posted to:
- chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
The Kamala Harris campaign is using memes and celebrities to present her as a fun-loving progressive candidate. In reality, she represented the ugly face of the US’ brutal and corrupt justice system as prosecutor. As Vice President, she has been an apologist for genocide, war, and anti-migrant policies.
Just gonna leave a comment here to remember to come back to this when I show the lib I work with when he inevitably defends Kamala like he did Biden
Sources?
Is there something about Waltz?
Not that I’m aware of. To be honest I only follow US electoral politics loosely at this point. The list of links about Harris only popped into my head as it was shared here just after Biden dropped out. I’m sure a comrade has compiled a list of Waltz’ misdeeds or done a video essay on him but I wouldn’t know where to look.
Thank you, but your link is a journalized opinion which means it’s not official or trained. This is a bad source
I couldn’t have possibly known that a list of articles from The Guardian, LA Times, The Nation, Rolling Stone, SF Gate, Huffington Post, Jacobin, The Intercept, The Atlantic, and more doesn’t meet your definition of journalism and is in some twisted way “opinion.”
If you don’t like it, leave it and keep harping on about our “sourceless claims.” We’ll clown you for a bit and then block you.
deleted by creator
And the said website with said links is unsecure.
Source?
Here’s the same content hosted on github.com: https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/main/socialism_faq.md#kamala-harris
Journalized like journalists from major news organisations have written about it? Blue MAGA is wild.
deleted by creator
The first link is literally from the Guardian. You’re a deeply unserious individual.
deleted by creator
Just cybersecurity aware. I don’t trust the site.
You don’t trust Github? You are not cybersecurity aware, you are just aware of the concept of cybersecurity. They are not the same thing.
Thank you, but your link is a journalized opinion which means it’s not official or trained. This is a bad source
Weird how your original reply doesn’t mention malware at all
Especially since you must’ve opened the site to know it’s a ”journalized opinion”.
Deepthroat that boot
Then google the headlines if you don’t trust the links
I’m sorry that this is not official enough for you, i suppose you’d like your sources to come with the state department’s stamp of approval?
It’s a list of links to primary sources. Extremely suspicious you’d dismiss it in such a way.
Dessalines doesn’t even show up on Media Bias/Fact Check; content discarded 😏
deleted by creator
Oh no, a collection of links! This must be malware! Has anyone even heard of GitHub? I bet it’s Russian
Are you kidding right now? The links are all to regular news/article sites, don’t tell me you don’t know how to see where a hyperlink leads to.
lmao
AFAIK all browsers show the full link in the bottom left when you hover over them. Also, I’m wondering what websites you know of that would be able to present you with evidence of her actions without linking to the relevent evidence? Do you just want a link to someone you already trust telling you what you want to hear?
Links, you’re giving me links that have links!!!? What has this world come to!!!