• Kirbywithwhip1987
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Idk if chicken would be appropriate for T-Rex, but idk of any other options either considering Cassowaries are Raptors, Shoebill maybe? But yeah Komodos have that T-Rex or Giganotosaurus vibe when they stand on 2 legs anyway.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I just figure there’s a bunch of antisemetic conspiracies about lizard people, don’t want right-wingers appropriating your meme.

        Shoebill wouldn’t be a great look for similar reasons.

      • cayde6ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        Out of all birds, the Chicken is the closest relative to T-Rex

        • Kirbywithwhip1987
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Fr? Bruh it can’t be, I thought it was just a meme, it has to be some of those big badass birds unless actually true and he got the most insane downgrade in history unlike other dinosaurs.

            • cayde6ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’m not wrong. Or at least I’m 99 percent sure I’m not. I’ve read this numerous times from paleontologists.

          • cayde6ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Birds share common ancestry with Dinosaurs, and are considered Dinosaurs. Not everything has to be big or badass

            • Kirbywithwhip1987
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I know lmao, but not every dinosaur is a Cassowary nowadays, some got downgraded, it’s just hard to imagine that out of all the chicken is the one who’s closest to T-Rex.

        • gobble_ghoul [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s not how it works. All birds share a common ancestor that was a cousin to it, so they’re all equally related to it in terms of when they split off. For chickens to be more closely related to T. rex, they would have to share a more recent common ancestor with it than they do with other birds. That would also make T. rex a bird if you still wanted to count chickens as birds.

          • cayde6ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I guess paleontologists are wrong then.

            • gobble_ghoul [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Feel free to cite your source. If you’re thinking of the idea that chickens may have more conservative genomes than most other birds, then I get where you’re coming from, but we don’t actually know what T. rex’s genome looked like to be able to compare them. It’s entirely possible that the T. rex genome would have changed in a lot of places where the chicken genome is relatively conservative, making chickens no more similar to T. rex genetically than any other bird is. That aside, all birds evolved from the same node on the cladogram, which was already pretty far removed from tyrannosaurs at that point. Saying chickens are more closely to T. rex than other birds are would be like me saying I’m more closely related to my great uncle (whose DNA we do not have) than my biological sibling is because I have 25.01% of his brother’s - my grandpa’s - DNA and my sibling only has 25%. It’s not provable because we will never recover the DNA to know the overlap. Even if we could prove that, it would only demonstrate that we are more related in a very strict genetic sense and ignore that we are exactly as related in terms of shared common descent.

              • cayde6ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                You have very fair points, but I do have a small amount of hope that one day we could find or recreate usable T-Rex dna.

                Yes, I know that DNA degrades relatively quickly, and finding DNA more than a hundred thousands years old/ 1 million years old is incredibly rare, but I remember reading that in some edge cases that DNA has been found in cases of 1 million or 10 million years old, and around a decade or more ago, it was reported that possible cellular structures that may contain T-Rex DNA had possibly been found.

                I wouldn’t get my hopes up, and there are hundreds of potential problems though.

                I’m not a paleontologist or geneticist though.