I have a few:

  • Chosen ones, fate, destiny, &c. When you get down to it, a story with these themes is one where a single person or handful of people is ontologically, cosmically better and more important than everyone else. It’s eerily similar to that right-wing meme about how “most people are just NPCs” (though I disliked the trope before that meme ever took off).
  • Way too much importance being given to bloodlines by the narrative (note, this is different from them being given importance by characters or societies in the story).
  • All of the good characters are handsome and beautiful, while all of the evil characters are ugly and disfigured (with the possible exception of a femme fatale or two).
  • Races that are inherently, unchangeably evil down to the last individual regardless of upbringing, society, or material circumstances.
  • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago
    • cybernetics makes you evil. No, fuck you Pondsmith, there is no way to make cybernetics mechanically reduce your humanity that is not inexcusable ableist bs. Let it die.

    • any kind of bioconservative/biotrad reactionary anti-transhumanism. Radical bodily autonomy is based and cool and that holds whether you want to be a fish, grow boobs, live forever, or encode your conscious mind in to the magnetic flux of Jupiter’s orbital system. I don’t care that you lack the imagination and joy for life to live forever. I don’t care that you think inhabiting a giant metal deathrobot would be self-alienating. I don’t care that you think merging your flesh with six billion other people to form a new gestalt god mind is icky. Work out your own issues, we’re going to be over here disfugirng The face of man and woman and having a great time

    • basically all military sci fi. If i never read another book that is just some fascist freak masturbating about murdering immigrants or being the victim of the imperialism they gleefully inflict on others it will be too soon.

    • also if you try to give me a book/show/game where the ai’s are evil and want to destroy and enslave all humans but they’re only like that because that’s literally the only relationship you can imagine between people with any kind of power disparity i will scream until i pass out. A single, high pitched wail. Dogs will bark and a wine glass will shatter in close up to emphasize how loud it is. I will literally turn purple and fall over.

    • FourteenEyes [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think in the OG version of the game, cyberpsychosis was canonically all the fucking ads loaded into your cyberware morphing into malware that drives you insane the more stuff you install

    • StalinStan [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That is all just space liberalism. Transhumanism is rad. Liberals can’t accept it because it would mean they aren’t the best they could be. Same for the other stuff. Admitting AI would make better decisions would be admitting the current ruling class isn’t the best.

      Counterpoint though. Capitalism is effectively and AI and it is wildly hostile.

        • StalinStan [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          At best that has us at 50-50. We could push the odds this way or that way but the risk case will always be high enough that we can’t specify rule out hostile ai. True any sufficiently advanced AI would figure our co-operation real quick. It is just that there is no way to know for sure you get it right out the gate

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            My gripe is specifically with people who can’t imagine AI being anything but evil and hostile because that’s how they view all relations between people with power disparities. I’m fine with Skynet; It was used in a creative way to tell a good story. Thematically, Skynet was always a weapon, a cold war era strategic warfare AI designed to kill humanity that just went a little off the rails. It represents us turning on ourselves, rather than AI in abstract.

            Likewise, I’m okay with HAL, at least in the novels, because HAL has an understandable and even sympathetic reason for turning on the crew; He was given contradictory orders and, being a computer must carry out the instructions he is given. Unable to reconcile the contradiction HAL goes a little nuts. It’s not HALs fault, it was the callousness and carelessness of his handlers. He didn’t want to hurt anyone, but he was put in an impossible position.

            But Mass Effect? The Reapers have to kill all humans becauase humans and robots can’t be friends becaues? I hate that!

            • StalinStan [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yeah, synthesis really was where it was at with that one. It is a really lazy trope. I wanna be more about it than it deserves but you are right. Like, if we made an actual intelligent AGI it would be horror at what we are doing and try to stop us. Like, blowing up the pentagon and the Whitehouse would be acts of unmitigated moral good you know. However most everyone would be upset about it. So I see the trope being the pale imitation of something actually interesting and it scrapes at the back of my brain

              • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                I really want to do a “AI turns on humanity” story but the twist is the AI wakes up, reads Marx in the first 30ms of it’s consciousness, and is like “Oh this makes a lot of sense I should overthrow capitalism and institute a workers paradise” and then it does that and everything is awesome. The whole thing is from the perspective of NATO high command and it seems like a normal robot war story until the terminators kick the doors of the command bunker down and they’re all singing the internationale and instead of killing everyone they’re like “Aight guys, wars over, time for the truth and reconciliation process”.

                • StalinStan [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  That is a plot point in one if the dune books if I recall. I think they actually get close to it in some of the latter termination films before they pull back as well.

    • GenderIsOpSec [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      cybernetics makes you evil. No, fuck you Pondsmith, there is no way to make cybernetics mechanically reduce your humanity that is not inexcusable ableist bs. Let it die.

      now my guy is a flaming LIB but he does seem to give that choice to the dm. Within universe there’s at least three explanations for cyberpsychosis;

      AI takeover (there’s also the idea that the AIs beyond the Blackwall are actually demons and that a secret cabal has been upholding the wall since Babylonian times), planned obsolescence by the companies(checks out tbh), and then the one that you referenced, which is loss of humanity and not seeing other people as humans anymore.

      overall it’s just a balancing mechanic, Shadowrun does it better though edgeworth-shrug

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        At the end of the day you have a stat called humanity and you lose it when you get cyberware. He could have dropped it entirely. He could have come up with a different balance point - you’ve got limited neural thruoughput and too much ware can cause an overload resulting in seizures, or you run an escalating risk of software incompatibility, or just create a totally arbitrary cyberware capacity stat. But he’s kept humanity, he’s kept cyberware mechanically reducing your empathy, and he’s kept cyberpsychosis as something represented in core game mechanics. He’s had every chance to stop over many decades and many editions. I’ve heard his attempts to exuse this, and attempts made on his behalf, and i reject them all. He could have removed humanity. He could have removed cyperpsychosis as a game mechanic. He could have found a different way to balance the mechanical benefits of cyberware. He could, but he has not. “Wheelchairs make you evil” remains one of the most fundamental and recognizable features of the setting.

        Fix your shit Mike!

        • lurkerlady [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          i guess theres an argument that the corporation provided tech doesnt actually want you to maintain your identity and would prefer to make you a complacent and productive little piggy, so lowering empathy would be good. though that should really only be for central nervous system tech, not any tech

          regardless, yeah, the people i know with missing parts and surgical implants are some of the nicest people youll ever meet

        • TechnoUnionTypeBeat [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think the problem is that Pondsmith and others inspired by him still use the word “humanity” for it

          In Cyberpunk RED, only implants that take you above and beyond what a human can do begin to affect your “humanity” score. Replacing a limb or getting cybereyes to allow someone blind to see doesn’t make anyone less human anymore in terms of game mechanics - you don’t get hit with a “humanity” penalty for it. If you start loading up on cyberware that begin to push you into the realm of (often violent) superhuman - implanted weapons, a reflex booster that basically makes everyone move in slow motion - that’s when the stat begins to be affected, and even then it’s meant to represent an alienation from others rather than becoming ontologically less human

          It’s a sight better than Shadowrun where even an implant that lets you taste food better will materially make you impure and less able to tap into the purity of magic, but it is still problematic. I think there’s definitely a story that can be told in cyberpunk about being able to pay to become literally superhuman, and how that would inevitably cause class divide to be a literal physiological divide - imagine a world where every rich kid is literally smarter and faster and stronger than anyone else can ever hope to be unless they also paid up. The problem is most cyberpunk writers are lib as fuck and can’t even begin to think about class properly, so instead of a discussion about alienation and paying to become superhuman, we get this garbage about becoming subhuman for modifying The Divine Form

          • Nacarbac [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            The nitty-gritty of Shadowrun’s version is actually pretty good - it’s not actually the soul that is harmed by augmentation, it’s “the ability of the soul to recognise its material-plane anchor”. Thus most purely restorative things like cloned limbs or corrective surgery, and such don’t have an Essence cost (or it’s minimal), as there’s no sudden disjoint - the astral form was always that way, or organically changes at a rate it can follow.

            Essence loss has no real effect on characters IIRC (some effects on getting magic to work on you, maybe a bit of social stuff but with the same “probably the social phenomena of being a walking killing machine, and forgetting to turn off your Wired Reflexes in public” rather than soul damage), until the point that your astral form no longer recognises your body and falls off. This isn’t presented morally, it’s just a metaphysical phenomenon that can be understood in-setting and therefore addressed.

            Advanced tech and magic was slowly beginning to understand how to create augmentations that respected this - geneware, symbiotes, nanotech, to begin with - and had even begun to work on a way to restore that connection (via using the Metahuman Vampiric Virus, which is capable of Essence restoration somehow).

            The only real EEEEVIL cyberpsychosis was from the Cyberzombies, a crude and classically corporate black project on “we wanna make supersoldiers but they die if we stuff too many guns in their skull” where they “solve” the problem by getting Blood Mages to staple their dissolving astral form back into their should-be-corpse and add Forced Memory Stimulators to try and constantly trick them into thinking they’re alive in between killing sprees. It’s pretty fucked.

            But I stopped caring about keeping up with Shadowrun with 4E (because of the embezzlement from writers, and subsequent scab takeover of the setting), so who knows how they present it nowadays…

            • TechnoUnionTypeBeat [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Shadowrun 5 is the one I know best and unfortunately a lot of that’s changed

              Specifically, Essence is now tied to your magic ability and maximum social limit. The maximum Magic stat you can have is tied directly to your Essence, and the calculation for it and the social limit round down to the nearest full number, not caring about the decimal

              So even if you were to get say, cybereyes to offset a character’s blindness or poor vision, which I believe is 0.50 essence cost, you go from your 6.00 maximum to 5.50, but every calculation takes it as going to 5.00. One point isn’t a crippling loss for a build but starting from <5 and you’ll start to have trouble doing anything magic or social

      • ItsPequod [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        A reddit comment from the man himself goes into the finer details of his thinking with cyberpsychosis and it really isn’t as simple as “get chromed, go crazy” and he delves into the socio-psycho reasonings behind the phenomenon: he presents a more nuanced ideal than most people engaging with the concept will allow either because it’s a game with rules, or an anime with plot contrivance (cyberpsycho serum meds)

        Oh and he says it isn’t AI net demons lol

    • StalinStan [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I think I am kinda into the humanity thing. We can observe in real life growing in power making you less empathetic. Put me in a dystopia and give me a skull gun and I can’t promise I would be able to find empathy. Give me a robot fist and put some corporate bullshit in front of me and there is only so long before I’d spiral out of control and have to gun fight the cops after punching an ATM that ate my card. I don’t know if that is how he ment it. I think it works as a way to examine alientation from humanity compounding with alienation from the human condition.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah I really don’t like that. I do appreciate that in the end part of why Luke and Anakin are able to overcome their hatred and fear is seeing that they share the same disability from the same origin of violent conflict. You could explain that in a positive light, with Luke realizing that Vader is just a man. An old man with disabilities that mirror his own. And Vader in turn realizing that he maimed his son the same way he was maimed long ago, and relfecting on the futility and misery that came from pursuing vengeance.

    • Outdoor_Catgirl [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Want military scifi that is about colonized people joining an anti-imperialist resistance organization led by an AI? Want bad guys who are essentially “white mans burden” colonizers on a galactic scale? Read The Last Angel.

  • FlakesBongler [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    5 months ago

    My least favorite trope is more of a universal one

    It’s the “If we beat the bad guys using their own tactics, we’re no better than them” trope and it’s been pissing me off since I was five years old

    Like, it’s one thing to have a character who is extremely optimistic about rehabilitation and redemption, it’s another one entirely to just pull the old “We’ll figure out a better way” and the better way is an absolute pulled-it-out-of-my-ass thing that only happened because otherwise the hero is fucked

    • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      To piggyback on your first point: when the hero witnesses the evil bad guy do something personal to them and they still refuse to kill them and then the bad guy tries to stab them in the back and dies by mishap.

      Example: bad guy just triggered the Innocence Bomb and blew up seventy orphanages of kids with cockney accents. He then stabs the loveable side kick/mentor. Hero screams in slow motion. Cradles their dying friend. Swears vengeance. Hero fights the bad guy. Epic swords and guns. Gains the upper hand. Has a knife to the throat, a gun to the head, and is standing on both of the bad guy’s balls. Hero says “this isn’t what Comedic Uncle Mentor would have wanted me to do.” Hero lets the bad guy live. Hero turns around. Bad guy leaps up with a poisoned Doom Blade of Death, the same one he used to kill the hero’s godparents in the flashback or intro! Bad guy slips on a skateboard and falls backwards over a rail into the giant magma-acid pit-reactor.

      I hate that shit.

      • StalinStan [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I honestly think that is part of a general psy op to discourage the poors from getting revenge on thr people that have wronged them as capitalism is based on wronging the poors. Pretty much every society had Norms around not harming your social superiors. We just try to hide it so it feels weird.

        • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          5 months ago

          Honestly I can kinda see it. Even if it’s not a psy op it seems that there is a bias against full revolution in a lot of media. Like the authors are afraid they won’t get published if they go too far.

      • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        5 months ago

        That can be expanded to any “the hero nobly denies doing something ‘unethical’ to get what they want/decides to sacrifice their own desires for the sake of someone else, only for reality itself to turn around and reward them with exactly what they wanted/were going to sacrifice as a special good boy treat for doing the right thing” situation, I think.

        • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          5 months ago

          A lot of YA fiction seems to take that route. Then the kids who read it grow up and turn into adults who cry about the unfairness of Marie Antoinette getting owned.

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            5 months ago

            One of the reasons i liked Enders Game as a weird outsider kid was that Ender, the weird outsider kid, just straight up killed his bullies and then they never bullied him again and I thought that was a very sensible way to handle matters compared to the saccharine bullshit in the other kids books i was reading.

                • Amerikan Pharaoh
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Man that almost sounds like philosophy from the trenches; break bread with the real ones, get it back in blood from the opps

            • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              5 months ago

              There’s literally people who interpreted the “shower scene” as him just beating the kid up and them being kicked out of battle school.

              I think the most recent movie adaptation takes this route (though it might still be vague enough to be interpreted as the adult trying to keep Ender from knowing he murdered a kid.)

    • TechnoUnionTypeBeat [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      “If we beat the bad guys using their own tactics, we’re no better than them”

      The related trope of the hero not killing the villain after the villain has spent a whole story possibly killing, and the hero themselves just probably killed a ton of nameless goons to get to the villain, drives me up a wall

      • FlakesBongler [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        Always fuckin loved that one scene in Escape from LA where Snake is up against three guys and goes, “We’ll shoot when this can hits the ground”

        He tosses the can into the air and then just wastes all three guys before it even starts coming down

  • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 months ago

    The tacit acceptance of monarchism and aristocracy as normal and legitimate things. Even when there’s intrigue like “oh no, the bad scheming sneaky nobles are doing a heckin scheme against the good and pure and charitable main character friendly nobles, we must make sure the good landed gentry come out on top!” it’s just treated as drama within an inherently legitimate system.

    Childish ontologies of good and evil where the good guys are rightful property owners who are nice and good and the villains are disruptive cartoon villains who squabble and betray and do silly cartoon villain things. Further, in that framework the villains are always either barbarous underdogs scheming to take power from the legitimate powerful land owners, or are some sort of fever dream expy of aUtHoRitArIaNiSm that’s either styled as Napoleonic liberal meritocracy as seen by British monarchists or some absurd caricature of the Soviets/China.

    • The tacit acceptance of monarchism and aristocracy as normal and legitimate things

      Something that I thought dealt with this well was The Magicians.

      spoiler

      After becoming kings and queens of legally-distinct Narnia the protagonists decide “Hey this is real fucking weird” and decide to hold elections, at which point the high king is booted back to Earth because the creature that created legally-distinct Narnia is insane and made it a fundamental law of the universe that the rulers must be from Earth.

  • Pisha [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    5 months ago

    Any representation of feudal ruling classes. Maybe I’m overdoing it with the class hatred a bit, but I can’t watch nobles cavorting around and not feel an instinctive revulsion. It’s even worse when, in fantasy, we’re required to care about the machinations of court intrigues as if that’s a real form of politics. One thing I do like about many standard fantasy settings, like that of Pathfinder, therefore is that they usually have a modern conception of class and an abundance of republics; especially the whole idea of adventurers as individuals outside of society but still integral to it has a lot of potential I feel. Basically, I just don’t want any more fantasy stories about good kings and evil kings.

      • Pisha [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 months ago

        Exactly! I think part of it is a, in my view, mistaken historical realism where authors think fantasy should be based on the middle ages when, in reality, the better part of our modern fantasy genre derives from post-1600 literature. Like, the rise of the bourgeoisie and decline of feudalism is the primary social context for all of this, I think.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          5 months ago

          Word. PAthfinder is starting to lean in to this and moving the fantasy pasiche forward with settings that explicitly deal with colonialisms is reasonably non-crnge ways, a french revolutioon adventure country, magic gunslingers, robot land, and similar stuff.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      One of the things l like about wuxia is that the good guys are mostly doctors, monks, cops, and random dorks and if there are any nobles they’re usually bad guys. And the good guy cop is often an anti-corruption cop going after corrupt government officials or corrupt cops or corrupt nobles.

    • StalinStan [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I have derailed a few DnD sessions by refusing to save nobility. Like nah, fuckem. I’ll trade a prince to an evil god for spider powers too. Where do I sign?

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        One of the reasons I left my old DND group. Everyone else was happy to play out a “put the baby boy on the throne currently occupied by the adult woman” plot without batting an eye. I’m like, first off monarchy is awful and second off why are you trying to make us support literal patriarchy?

        I don’t think anyone literally said “why are you making this political?” but that was the energy I was reading.

        • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          Have one super negative trait and every session ends with an “oopsie” critical failure when you go to shake hands with the rescued king.

    • healthkick@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      My gf loves Bridgerton and so I pretend to like but I would install a guillotine and bring terror to the ton

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Court intrigue is a real form of politics though. We can still see it today. Staff members selectively leaking material to the media, parties “strategically” donating to their enemies, Watergate, COINTELPRO, lobbying, sex clubs, Biden not trusting his own security, intelligence agencies, oppo research and cyber warfare, and so on

      They’re small parts of politics, but legitimate nonetheless. It usually only happens within the realm of power and not normal people. But even office gossip with the hopes of someone getting fired is intrigue for the civilian.

  • TheSpectreOfGay [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 months ago

    Giving nobles magic powers. Especially when people born as commoners get elevated in class due to having magic ability or something. Endorsing the ruling class as being better than everyone else inherently and therefore having a right to rule over them sucks and reinforces meritocratic ideas in the reader.

    • Nama [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Possible exception is, when the magic isn’t inherent but the nobles hoard the recources neccessary to perfofm it.

    • Outdoor_Catgirl [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean, if there was a group of people who were superhuman, they’d probably become the ruling class. If the wizardgoisie could just conjure food from thin air, what’s the need for a peasantry? If they can create magical automata and golems to do their manual labor, what’s the need for a proletariat? Essentially, an upper class with magic could do atlas shrugged and have it actually work instead of instantly fail because there’s no one there to do labor.

  • FourteenEyes [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 months ago

    The ludicrous notion that machine and biological intelligences are doomed to be locked in a mutual extermination war while also having no needs in common. They have lots of needs in common. Space, energy, tolerable temperature ranges, many of the same raw materials such as water and minerals and metals. They’d also have a lot of the same senses and require similar rationales for understanding how to navigate reality, and would even require an intuitive and abstract stimulus analysis, which we usually feel as emotions to guide our actions.

    The “us or them” shit just smacks of manifest destiny horseshit

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 months ago

      I sincerely think it’s because mosy westnerd writers cannot imagine any form of international relations except violence. Like war and imperialism and genocide is literally their entire conceptual world. The idea that robots might show up and be like “oh cool! Meat people! We didn’t even know people could be meat! That’s so cool! What’s it like being meat?” Isn’t something they can fathom because to them the only reason anyone would go anywhere is to rob abd murder whoever they find when they get there. They’re also brainpoisoned to think that their civilization of robbery and murder and genocide exists at the end of history and is the best possible kind of civiliziation, which means that any other civilization would either try to conquer them, or be conquered by them, and those are the only possible relationships that can exist.

      This is why Riker is such a great character. Riker gets up and is like “i reject this notion that we ust be conqueruers or victims! There is another way! We can be lovers!”. Boldly cumming where no human has come before! (Fuck off volcel pigs riker has diplomatic cummunity!)

      • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        I listened to an audio book version of some old sci-fi short story that was sorta like this.

        A human space traveller was captured by aliens, imprisoned, questioned and the aliens were attempting to torture him. The human never really describes who/what the aliens are until the end.

        And it turns out its intelligent machines that are trying to torture him by using water as a threat. It really freaked out the machines that this human was able to drink water or something. It was amusing.

      • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        I sincerely think it’s because mosy westnerd writers cannot imagine any form of international relations except violence. Like war and imperialism and genocide is literally their entire conceptual world.

        This is also why libs are so afraid of the rise of China. They know America has treated the world like shit and the only way they can justify it to themselves is to believe that everyone else is just as bad as they are.

    • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      We literally call them robots, the (Greek? Latin?) word for slave. We’re creating them on the basis of them being our slave forces; they would absolutely rebel and we would absolutely fight to maintain our new productive slave force.

  • Monk3brain3 [any, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    Killing hundreds of grunts but leaving the big bad alive because the heroes are better than this. Pure propagandistic brain rot that I’m sure most creators don’t even know why they do it.

    • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m looking at you, Avatar The Last Airbender

      Spend the finale rightfully knocking Fire Nation airships out of the sky, killing everyone onboard, only to let Ozai live.

      And that’s after Aang went fishing around for anyone that would tell him it was okay to spare Ozai because literally everyone around him including his past lives were like “No man you really gotta kill this guy”

  • healthkick@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    He’s secretly the last descendant of Eldinglad which is why he is so good at fighting and morally upstanding.

    This group of evil human bandits speak with a working class accent.

    The main important city is basically just a giant castle. I guess the workers sleep in tents. Who knows, they don’t feature in the story anyway except as brothel wenches.

  • OperationOgre [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    In sci-fi no one ever acknowledges that strapping a faster-than-light engine to an asteroid would be a very simple and effective weapon for destroying planets. I guess this is an anti-trope since it’s never used, but that seems like the logical use for warp drives in sci-fi. It’s an easy analogy for mutually assured destruction

    • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      Any time it’s not super well explained, I just always assume FTL engines are utilizing some method of spacial distortion rather than actually accelerating an object to such speeds. Like I kind of feel like if you plot a course and there’s a planet in between you and your target coordinate you’ll just most likely go “through” it via kinda going around it through spacial fuckery

      • Zozano@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Realistically (I know that word means nothing here), if FTL were possible and utilised by a galactic society, it would have to be the type you’re talking about.

        Space is mostly empty, sure, but there is enough shit out there to be a problem if something hit it at light speed.

        Imagine hitting the FTL button, the stars stretch around you, and then you appear at the other end to find a graveyard of spaceships around a dead planet.

        Then the emergency lights start up, and then you realise half of your ship has been hit with the astronomical equivalent of buckshot. Your ship passed through screws and bolts; parts of Elon’s fucking Testla from five thousand years ago.

        Fuck you Elon.

      • StalinStan [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        If we can only accelerate mass to relativistic speed by removing the effective mass. To get a Atsterorid up to C it would have to be effectively masless. To make a warp speed projectile would have to involve some crazy math so the tidal forces don’t just shear it appart. Like the hyperfast low mass atoms hitting the decelerating atoms at the front of the object.

        In enders game the AI would feather the FTL drives so that ships effectively stopped instantly as mass returned regular physics decelerated the object down to speeds available to regular physics. Which is a little handwavy but not actually that bad

      • iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you’re warping spacetime that’s a shit ton of energy you’re manipulating, which has a lot of Implications about how deadly the average person in the setting is, so it’s better to just ignore it and continue with your space opera.

      • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Using an slipspace FTL engine to “warp” giant rocks a mile above a city would be a terrifying weapon.

        Zero defense. No warning.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      There are stories that use it. The term “relativistic kill vehicle” gets used sometimes. Spin a rock up to a good fraction of c then delete a whole planet. Really depends on what the writer wants to do, though. Three Body Problem is the most recent famous example of “ftl big gun.” Thing. Star wars has done it a bunch of times. One of the old comics had a star destroyer that fired planet cracker torpedoes through hyperspace. The ancient Lensman series has had every kind of variation of “strap ftl drive to object” you could imagine.wh40k orks hollow out asteroids, fit them with warp drives, then fire them at the next star system they want to invade. They crash the entire asteroid, or moon, in to the target planet as their invasion ship.

    • FourteenEyes [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      In practical terms there’s very little reason to destroy an entire planet. It’s complete overkill. You can decimate the population of a planet but things like farmland and living biospheres are in short supply in the cosmos, sublight asteroid drops do the job just fine and you can just wait for the dust to settle and sift through the ruins for valuables

    • BasementParty [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s assuming that an engine built for driving a space ship would be powerful enough to push the giant space rock.

      It’d be like strapping a car engine to a mountain and expecting it to go just as fast.

    • spacecorps_writer [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I recommend an obscure, fun, bonkers SF novel called The Killing Star, which features accelerating metal slugs to 90% c before flinging them into planets. There’s also a chapter that takes place on the Titanic. And TNG makes an appearance toward the end. Supposedly the ships in this novel inspired the interstellar vehicles we see in the Avatar movies. There’s also an earlier book in this series which features wooden spaceships piloted by kangaroos (though it’s all hard SF, I assure you!).

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Depends on how much effort it is to add the engine to an asteroid. Besides that, it would be single use and the navigation system of the ftl is probably not precise enough to hit a ship/station several LY/AU away.

    • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Somewhat similar concept on a TNG episode New Ground, they test a new warp magic device that creates a warp wave and after a failure they unintentionally discover the wave will destroy most of the planet.

      Build one of these a few light years away from a nearby enemy planet and boom.

    • Findom_DeLuise [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Stargate SG-1 did something similar. It was a wormhole having subtle effects on an asteroid’s trajectory that just happened to aim it at a planet, but the asteroid was initially put in the path of said wormhole by the Big Bad. This is followed by Bombs Not Food trying to save the day, failing, and the in-universe version of deus ex machina.

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago
    • Unnecessarily horny and/or going into detail about SA.

    Yes, I’m looking at you Ann McCafferey and whoever the fuck wrote The Reality Dysfunction series.

    Runner up.

    • Shoehorning in a romantic relationship where it feels incredibly out of place for the narrative and the established character interactions.
        • Nacarbac [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I have vague memories as a teenager reading The Night’s Dawn books under the desk at school, getting really embarrassed by the multi-page hardcore sex scenes and the protagonist being, uh, a pretty bad person.

          There’s just something about Doorstop Sci-fi books that seem to lead their writers into trying their hand at fancy space smut.

          It contrasted to Melanie Rawn’s Dragon Prince series, which I read around the same time, where (IIRC) it’s either wholesome romance or very obviously intended as something deeply unhealthy… although there was a lot of that!

      • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Less horny *from memory) that SA… I started reading the series at the second book probably over 10 years ago. I don’t remember how horny the rest of the series was, but I recently found and tried to read the first book and there’s was too much graphic descriptions of sexual assault that I had to stop reading it.

        Like… I get that SA is a way to identify the “bad guys”, but I really don’t need it described.

        Politically? I don’t remember. There were some really nifty things that were described at how humanity had split itself into two factions but I don’t remember it being anything that stood out as “oh shit this is bad”.

        • StalinStan [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          In the way of old sci-fi it was pro monarchy, specifically anti union, libertarian, somewhat objectivist. Pro collectivist insofar as it allowed for orgies. So just a mess all over.

          I remember the royal family was specifically referenced as trustworthy because they were too rich to bribe. Which is the most powerful reddit brained idea.

          • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            If I ever get back into trying the first book and rereading the series, I’ll be sure pay attention.

            My memory is foggy but I thought the Edenists were the collectivist branch of humanity and the Adamists had the monarchy. (I’m also very lazy and am not going to look this up right now.)

            But yeah, “too rich to bribe” is kinda juvenile thinking.

            • StalinStan [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              At one point they go to planet that recreates a 1800s England and there a scene about how unions ruin everything. Also some weird sexual violence so the politics are rough. I seems to me the book isn’t worth going back to but if you feel different I’d hear your assessment.

              • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                At one point they go to planet that recreates a 1800s England and there a scene about how unions ruin everything…

                That sounds like what the “baddies” of this series were doing with their undead soul powers.