• Devdogg@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    ·
    4 months ago

    There are old mushroom foragers and then there are bold ones. There are no bold, old mushroom foragers.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are no bold, old mushroom foragers

      Sure there are, they just have to not eat what they picked up.

      Source: friend’s mom once gave food poisoning to the whole family by serving them an omelet made with mushrooms she found, but didn’t eat it herself. Fortunately it was merely mushrooms of the “fucks up your stomach” variety.

      • Devdogg@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        4 months ago

        “Once” has no effect on my statement. There are no Bold, Old mushroom foragers.

        • FreddyDunningKruger@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          In his story, his friend’s mother boldly picked mushrooms from her backyard, cooked them into an omelet for the family, but DID NOT EAT the omelet herself.

          Nothing would stop her from growing old while continuing this pattern of bold collecting, although a stint in prison might make for an earlier retirement than expected from the foraging scene.

  • sushibowl@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    4 months ago

    Looks like a destroying angel (e.g. Amanita virosa) to me. This and the death cap together account for the vast majority of mushroom poisonings in the world. Cooking it will not destroy the toxins, nor will acid. Symptoms tend to appear 5-24 hours after eating, too late to pump the stomach. Half a mushroom can be enough to kill you.

    I don’t recommend going out to pick mushrooms unless you know what you’re doing. If you do, stay away from the white ones. You can still get terrible stomach cramps and diarrhea from other colors of mushrooms, but the white ones have the most dangerous species.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Easiest way to avoid problems I’ve heard is to never pick any mushroom with ribbed underside. If the underside looks like a sponge, it’s usually safe to eat. At least where I’m from.

      • sushibowl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        4 months ago

        Might be valid advice for some regions, I don’t know. But mushrooms tend to vary quite a bit in appearance. Sometimes ribbed species don’t have very visible ribs, or younger mushrooms don’t quite have all the characteristics of their mature form. If you really want to get into picking mushrooms, there’s often local groups you can join with a resident expert who can tell you which ones are safe.

        • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          4 months ago

          Rule of thumb with mushrooms is that these id tricks tend to be regional and not always accurate unfortunately. Nature is a bit more of a kaleidoscope.

        • Joe Cool@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s mostly true. Most of the poisonous mushrooms of central Europe are not “sponges”.
          The worst one I have found once is seldom lethal: Rubroboletus satanas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubroboletus_satanas
          I guess people don’t usually pick stuff that looks like that. Though there are similar ones that taste pretty good.
          Toxic boletus usually taste really bad.

      • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        Easiest way to not die from bad mushrooms is to not eat them because they’re fucking disgusting anyways

        • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 months ago

          You’re technically correct on one point, and totally entitled to your opinion on the other. But brown mushrooms (not from a can) sauteed into a hamburger steak gravy will kick it up about 14 notches, give or take.

          • Remorhaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I absolutely hated mushrooms my whole life because of a miserable first experience with them on pizza. The pizza place must have used the absolute worst, flavorless, slimiest canned mushrooms in the world. The were rubbery and disgusting. I was like 8 years old and refused to eat them until about five years ago.

            I had the most wonderful ramen at a restaurant recommended by my friends and it had shiitake mushrooms in it. I explained my aversion and they encouraged me to try it and my god the difference was incredible. I absolutely love shiitake now but I totally understand people who don’t like them

      • Taniwha420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, the sponge underside mushrooms are boletes, and I am not aware of any that are poisonous.

        • CM400@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          4 months ago

          There are some that are, and they can be hard to identify as well. Still a good idea to never eat what you find unless you’re with an experienced mushroomer to corroborate your find.

          • Final Remix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 months ago

            “How can I know they’re an experienced mushroomed?” “Well, for one… they’re not dead.”

      • sushibowl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not sure about this one, but acid resistance is pretty relevant because of the typical stomach environment. In general, amatoxins are just very stable and it’s difficult to deactivate them.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Neural networks are magical anywhere that near misses are good enough.

    Companies keep using them as if they’re infallible, when lives and fortunes are at stake.

    Tech is not the problem.

    • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Tech is ravenously trying to convince the world they need AI for every aspect of their business. Tech wants you to think LLMs are infallible and they strongly imply that they are even if the fine print says otherwise. So personally I would say tech is very much part of the problem. One could say they are the root of the problem in fact.

    • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, I have to agree with you. For example, I would have no problem using a decently tested LLMs for engineering simply because Engineering usually accounts for errors and uses appropriate factors to accommodate them. Sure LLMs could be get more accurate in future, but I believe the error will reduce asymptotically. Essentially, more accurate LLMs get, it will get that much harder to increase the accuracy. There is always a price to pay, IMO.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        “There’s always a price to pay” is basically what engineering is.

        Anybody could build a bridge to last 100 years, or to survive a barge ship crashing into it, but it takes an engineer to build a bridge that will barely last 100 years, or barely survive a bridge crashing into it (which you could kind of say the F.S.Key bridge did, since only really the middle section was taken out).

        Put another way, in the real world, there are budgets and sacrifices.

  • Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Amanita bisporigera, or the aptly named eastern North American destroying angel, if anyone’s wondering.

    From Wikipedia:

    The principal amatoxin, α-amanitin, is readily absorbed across the intestine, and 60% of the absorbed toxin is excreted into bile and undergoes enterohepatic circulation; the kidneys clear the remaining 40%. The toxin inhibits the enzyme RNA polymerase II, thereby interfering with DNA transcription, which suppresses RNA production and protein synthesis. This causes cellular necrosis, especially in cells which are initially exposed and have rapid rates of protein synthesis. This process results in severe acute liver dysfunction and, ultimately, liver failure.

    I could not confirm that it causes liquefactive necrosis of the liver specifically, however. I wouldn’t doubt it, but I couldn’t confirm it.

    Edit: I should clarify, I got this from the original thread on Bluesky, not my own identification.

  • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    joker-shopping i didnt even consider that this AI shit was going to claim to be able to ID mushrooms

    ok ive been a little skeptical of the idea so far but now im fully convinced. this dumb ai shit is going to get people killed. like straight up more than one person is going to die because of these upjumped autocorrects masquerading as intelligence. and no one is going to be held responsible.

    • halvar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      4 months ago

      This guy sees the most terrifying description of a toxin killing someone and goes “Yep, that’s a fun mushroom facto”

    • Asherah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Fungi are fascinating. Did you know that, if I’m recalling correctly, the largest living organism is a massive fungus?

      • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        And reindeer are trained to follow the smell of human piss because they like tripping on amanita muscaria, which transfers its psychoactive compounds through urine.

        Wacky!

      • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not the shared root system tree in North America? I could totally see it being a mushroom.

    • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You’d have to use a very strange definition of edible. For something to be edible it does not only need to be able to fit down your throat, it has to be capable of nourishing you without harming you. You can swallow paper and it won’t harm you, but it also can’t nourish you and is thus inedible. You can eat this mushroom and it’ll probably provide some kind of nourishment, but then it will swiftly kill you and thus it is inedible.

      I would accept a definition of edible which includes things you can’t digest. For example, gold can also be a food additive referred to by the code E175. Can’t digest it, but it doesn’t hurt you. So I could accept someone referring to gold as edible. But I think the barest, most universal element of something being edible is that it doesn’t kill you. If literal deadly poison is considered edible one must wonder what the word “edible” is even supposed to mean.

      • Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Jimmy Neutron “sodium chloride” ass reply, “everything is edible at least once” is a common joke that works precisely because words’ definitions are not rigid

        Edit: I think it’s best to leave this comment up as I originally wrote it, but I’m also going to go on the record to say that I could’ve and should’ve phrased this a lot more cordially.

        • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          It seems I misremembered this story that I read years ago after eating some and feeling queasy for several hours:

          To add a caveat, in 2004 when the current edition of the Encyclopedia of Fungi was launched at a National Trust property, to which 60 journalists were invited for lunch, there was an incident involving this species. On the day before, we had found a specimen of Laetiporus sulphureus in prime condition, on Oak, which was collected and incorporated, lightly sauteed, as part of the meal.

          Approximately half an hour after ingestion, 6 of the 60 journalists became violently ill – vomiting, cyanosed, sweating, icy cold, with raised pulse, and very frightened. The remaining 54 suffered no ill effects.

          The doctor who attended diagnosed a severe allergic reaction and the symptoms subsided after about 2 hours.

          Subsequent investigation turned up research by a US-based toxicology team at the University of Berkeley, California. It had concluded that 10% of the people taking part in extensive trials, suffered these severe effects. Our experience was exactly in line with this figure.

          It’s also worth bearing in mind that Laetiporus sulphureus growing on Taxus hosts, is potentially lethal.

          https://blog.mycology.cornell.edu/2006/10/31/eating-the-chicken-of-the-woods/

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are also mushrooms that look like morels that you shouldn’t eat. Somewhat easy to filter out if you know what you’re looking for but maybe wouldn’t say hard to fuck up.

  • The_Tired_Horizon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I remember being on a wilderness weekend many years ago and being told that when you cut the stem on some poisonous shrooms they discolour a sort of blue tint. I’m lucky, I hate the taste and texture of mushrooms.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      I wonder if it fits above or bellow the Demon Core.

      At least looks like this is quicker.

        • cmbabul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I remember reading Hiroshima, I don’t ever want the skin surround my hand to slough off

      • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I was confused as these two person are on different sub-domains of bsky.social (url after the @ symbol). Does this mean they are on different instance? AFAIK most mastodon server I see have different domain (specifically, different combination of top level domain and second level domian).

        EDIT: I see, theur user name is the subdomain, and things before @ is their display name. Not the most conventional system, but it makes sense.