Owl [he/him]

Contents: 1 live owl. Do not eat.

  • 211 Posts
  • 2.19K Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 26th, 2020

help-circle




  • It’s the 90s and you’re a business ghoul trying to claw your way up to entrench yourself further and claw your way up above your peers. You shop around for fringe ideologues whose ideas would end up advancing your position, and invest some money to get them into into think tanks, advertising firms, talk shows, and the like. The reach of broadcast media explodes, the industry expands and everyone who got in early rises to the top, including your useful idiots. The propaganda industry gets better at its job, and you’re still listening to the TV. You bought these messages because they were convenient to you, but they’re so good at their job now that they’ve convinced you too. You’re now a true believer in whatever nonsense was tactically convenient to you 30 years ago.

    (As fun as this narrative is, I’d like to point out that adding more details makes a story less likely to be true while making it sound more likely to be true.)




  • The sectarian BS is symptomatic of a deeper problem - no modern western left wing movement has a viable theory of victory. If some group puts together a set of tactics that advance a strategy that repeatably provides material victories, then everyone will fall in line because that movement keeps winning. Until then, we’ll all argue over which idealistic horseshit is a more palatable excuse for why we’re not winning but some day we will be.



  • You’re probably thinking of personal property. Private property is things you own for other people to use.

    A house is private property if a landlord is renting it to you, and personal property if you live in it.

    Abolishing private ownership of housing would mean you still own your house, but mortgages and landlordship are illegal, so the demand crashes and they’re cheap. Cheap enough? Probably not on its own (not that housing is cheap enough for everyone to get one in our current system); there’d need to be subsidies for construction, and real estate companies would have to adapt to be cheaper as well, and heavily regulated so they don’t come up with schemes that are basically just rent and mortgages again.

    That might sound like a lot of fresh new government bureaucracy, but you have to contrast it with the giant chunks of the legal system needed to enforce debt collection, rent, and evictions.