Through the use of data visualizations, the Economist makes the case that Putin is uniquely evil because Russia is pursuing the tactic of a direct military invasion in Ukraine.

Here is where the propaganda comes in. The 3rd figure they use showcases the relative imperial nature of Russia as compared to other countries conveniently leaving out the US!

Evidently, the propagandists at the Economist thought that when it came to the last 200 years it would be more relevant to include data about total territory acquired through conquest by showcasing Italy and the Ottoman empire, rather than US.

The Economist leaves out the US for the obvious reason that it looks far worse than Russia when their own arguments are applied.

Let’s take a look at just a few conquests that the US was involved in over the last 200 years that led to gain of territories (not an exhaustive list):

  • The numerous wars of western expansion against a variety of indigenous societies. A few examples: (Black Hawk War (1832), Second Seminole War (1835–1842), Texas Comanche Wars (1836–1875), Cayuse War (1847–1855), Apache Wars (1849–1924), Navajo Wars (1849–1866), Puget Sound War (1855–1856), Rogue River Wars (1855–1856), Great Sioux War of 1876 (1876–1877).
  • Mexican–American War (1846–1848): Lead to the conquest of most of modern day Arizona, California, Nevada and Utah.
  • Spanish–American War (1898): Lead to the conquest of Cuba
  • Philippine–American War (1899–1902): Lead to the conquest of the Philippines
  • United States occupation of Nicaragua (1912–1933): Lead to the conquest of Nicaragua, managed under a US controlled protectorate government.
  • United States occupation of Haiti (1915–1934): Lead to the conquest of Haiti, controlled by US military regime.
  • United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (1916–1924): Lead to the conquest of the Dominican Republic, controlled by US military regime.
  • Occupation of Japan and west Germany in World War II (1941–1945): It can be argued that the USA conquered these territories for a number of years after the war with near total control.
  • Occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan (recent history): Though a bit more fuzzy you can make a good argument that the USA conquered and had relatively near total control over these regions.
  • CountryBreakfast
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Some of these wars the US faught were outright massacres. For example Coquille writers have called the Rouge River “Wars” a holocaust. It was one of the most devastating and onesided series of violence committed by militias and the US army. The hard fast devastation is still felt today as Indigenous scholars and their occomplices try to peice together the cultures, languages, and histories of so called west Oregon.

    Anyway I say this out of solidarity, and out of hatred for the US and the insidious propaganda that covers its crimes and advances its agenda. Despicable. I always have to read the economist for school. Nothing has changed since Lenin roasted them.