• lxvi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s right on the line but so is Noam Chomsky for the same reasons. The subject matter is fine. Biologically supported racism is about a century too irrelevant and the people who still believe it aren’t going to care about the video. Because of that it’s self congratulatory, making a fuss over a nonthreatening topic to feel good and superior, mentioning a couple facts to call it educational just like putting a scant slice of meat and cheese on bread to call it a sandwich. The problem is majorly the presumed truisms that communism is inferior or bad and such which becomes the whole focus of the video subordinating the topic of race theory to a supporting argument.

    But sure race theory has no credibility. It’s been used to justify and explain the misery of the lower classes. There’s a lot of history to go into there.

    On a side note, I like how you can tell the content of a video by it’s art.