I mean we should be out on the streets protesting all arms deliveries to Ukraine and demanding that our politicians push for peace negotiations instead. But in terms of this specific one, it’s more of the same pattern we’ve already seen.
First the Americans push one of their European vassals to send a new type of weapons system (in this case the trial balloon was Britain and Storm Shadows) that they haven’t sent so far, then they use this as a justification to say “see, it’s ok if we do it too, it’s not an escalation anymore”, so eventually the US and the rest of NATO start sending theirs. They did it with the tanks, they did it with artillery, and there was no reason to doubt that they would do it with long range missiles too eventually.
The problem is that we have already seen that this does not tend to produce any qualitative change in the balance of forces of this conflict. For sure these kinds of actions prolong it and force Russia to adapt and possibly to respond in kind (as they have done in response to the cluster munitions), but they do not turn the tide for Ukraine. Russia has already shot down similar missiles sent by Britain and no doubt their air defenses will learn to shoot these down as well.
Undoubtedly some amount of damage will be done initially, the cheerleaders in the media will cheer for some pictures of a hit here or there, and Ukraine will not be able to resist using these missiles against civilian targets, but the military situation will remain the same and this will not be any more of a “game changer” than any of the other purported “wonder weapons”. In fact in this case it will be even less impactful because the West does not have all that many of these sorts of weapons to begin with.
So the question becomes, at what point do Westerners finally acknowledge that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is fundamentally irrational, unproductive, and deterimental even for their own self-interest?
This is for the most part solid analysis but the argument falls apart when they mention “a decapitated Russia”. That may have been their intention and their hope at the start but at this point that is not looking even remotely possible to achieve. This has been a massive miscalculation by Europe which will come out as the biggest loser in this whole geopolitical confrontation, because the US will make sure that its losses are transferred onto Europe. Europe being in the subordinate position will see its wealth siphoned off to the US so that the US can slow down its own precipitous decline as the stream of plunder which the Western imperialist system was accustomed to extracting out of the global south is slowly but surely drying up. BRICS+ and China’s Belt and Road Initiative are visibly shattering the West’s neo-colonial global dominance and more and more countries will start seeing which way the wind is blowing.
I mean we should be out on the streets protesting all arms deliveries to Ukraine and demanding that our politicians push for peace negotiations instead. But in terms of this specific one, it’s more of the same pattern we’ve already seen.
First the Americans push one of their European vassals to send a new type of weapons system (in this case the trial balloon was Britain and Storm Shadows) that they haven’t sent so far, then they use this as a justification to say “see, it’s ok if we do it too, it’s not an escalation anymore”, so eventually the US and the rest of NATO start sending theirs. They did it with the tanks, they did it with artillery, and there was no reason to doubt that they would do it with long range missiles too eventually.
The problem is that we have already seen that this does not tend to produce any qualitative change in the balance of forces of this conflict. For sure these kinds of actions prolong it and force Russia to adapt and possibly to respond in kind (as they have done in response to the cluster munitions), but they do not turn the tide for Ukraine. Russia has already shot down similar missiles sent by Britain and no doubt their air defenses will learn to shoot these down as well.
Undoubtedly some amount of damage will be done initially, the cheerleaders in the media will cheer for some pictures of a hit here or there, and Ukraine will not be able to resist using these missiles against civilian targets, but the military situation will remain the same and this will not be any more of a “game changer” than any of the other purported “wonder weapons”. In fact in this case it will be even less impactful because the West does not have all that many of these sorts of weapons to begin with.
So the question becomes, at what point do Westerners finally acknowledge that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is fundamentally irrational, unproductive, and deterimental even for their own self-interest?
just admit it westerners are too dumb for this planet
deleted by creator
This is for the most part solid analysis but the argument falls apart when they mention “a decapitated Russia”. That may have been their intention and their hope at the start but at this point that is not looking even remotely possible to achieve. This has been a massive miscalculation by Europe which will come out as the biggest loser in this whole geopolitical confrontation, because the US will make sure that its losses are transferred onto Europe. Europe being in the subordinate position will see its wealth siphoned off to the US so that the US can slow down its own precipitous decline as the stream of plunder which the Western imperialist system was accustomed to extracting out of the global south is slowly but surely drying up. BRICS+ and China’s Belt and Road Initiative are visibly shattering the West’s neo-colonial global dominance and more and more countries will start seeing which way the wind is blowing.
bravo
the problem becomes in the case of long range missiles US and UK made missiles being used on the civilian centers of a nuclear power