Turns out that fighting a peer competitor is very different from bombing defenceless people

The NATO style of fighting, so heavily reliant on controlling the skies, has also only been tested in recent years in arenas where the alliance had air superiority, experts say.

“No living member of NATO armed forces has experienced combat close to what Ukrainians have experienced over the past 18 months,” Davis Ellison, a strategic analyst with the Hague Center for Security Studies (HCSS), told Newsweek.

“The NATO way of land warfare has never been seriously tested against a major state adversary, despite decades of investment and training,” he added.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also love how they keep lamenting Ukraine falling back to Soviet tactics, like you know stuff that actually works in practice.

      • Shrike502
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s part of what I meant - it reads with an unspoken assumption that “Soviet tactics” (whatever that means) are inherently inferior to “NATO standards”

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Decades of western propaganda are now clashing with reality, and people who’ve internalized it don’t know how to process this.

        • REEEEvolution
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          They believed the old “human waves” myth they themselves spread.

  • Every time I ever did an exercise with americans they always had to change the rules to win. Imagine pulling a millennium challenge because your infantry company got routed by 10 dudes and still thinking you are good at what you do

        • Shrike502
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What’s your impression of the people there? Troops, officers?

          • In one word, stubborn. The officers I saw ranged from assholes (who salutes in the field?) to normal nerds with a history degree. The enlisted was really diverse, it ranged from frat bro types, wanna-be the bad guy from avatar 2 types, guys waiting for their contracts to end, guys who joined for their greencard which I think is particularly fucked up systemically, and a couple of nerds sprinkled in too. The officers didn’t really interact much with the troops off duty which was a bit strange for me, usually where I’m from while they still have separate messes it wouldn’t be unusual for an officer to be invited in after an exercise by their subordinates.

  • REEEEvolution
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Modern day gun boat diplomacy tactics do not work against a peer level force? Who would have thought!