• taiphlosion
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hold up didn’t they run war games at the beginning of the century and got dog walked so badly by the team playing as Iran they had to change the rules so the US would win?

    And that was 23 years ago???

      • taiphlosion
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh it wasn’t just an article…

        The rule changes following the restart led to accusations that the war game had turned from an honest, open, free playtest of U.S. war-fighting capabilities into a rigidly controlled and scripted exercise intended to end in an overwhelming U.S. victory, alleging that “$250 million was wasted”. Van Riper was extremely critical of the scripted nature of the new exercise and resigned from the exercise in the middle of the war game. Van Riper later said that Vice Admiral Marty Mayer altered the exercise’s purpose to reinforce existing doctrine and notions within the U.S. military rather than serving as a learning experience. (Emphasis mine)

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah yeah, that’s the one, it’s pure gold. I wonder if people in us military are starting to realize just how woefully unprepared they are seeing the debacle in Ukraine unfold.

          • taiphlosion
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who knows, the propaganda machine is probably stronger in the military so they might actually believe their own bullshit.

            • Shrike502
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s the thing, isn’t it? If the people in charge of making the decisions to end lives - to potentially end all life on Earth - are indeed high on their own fumes, they won’t hesitate to set the world on fire. Because they think they can win. Because “they always win”

              • taiphlosion
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                The only saving grace I feel like is that it would be bad for business, and they’re too greedy to do that.

                I only hope I’m right.

        • ShiningWing
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wasn’t there also a similar one in more recent times that was simulating a war with the DPRK or something and the US side could only win by literally reviving their own soldiers with a magic wand? I forget what it was called