• commiespammer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    I agree that China should be more progressive with family policy. However, in terms of public opinion the survey only questioned 3000 people. Just looking at the average bilibili comments section where the Paris Olympics ceremony was mentioned, it’s pretty clear that Chinese society has a long way to go.

    • Sodium_nitride
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Eh, a sample size of 3000 is actually pretty good. The standard deviation of the samples is 55 times less than that of the population, which makes it astronomically unlikely that the survey’s results significantly misrepresent chinese views on the topic (ignoring sampling bias, which unfortunately can be a real issue).

      Just looking at the average bilibili comments section where the Paris Olympics ceremony was mentioned

      I imagine this is partially because chinese people are less familiar with western cultural norms and history, not necessarily that they oppose lgbtq rights, but I am not sure what the comments actually said so this is just speculation in my part.

      • Munrock ☭
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        26 days ago

        The survey disproportionately sampled from urban populations over rural. It’s not representative of the whole Chinese population.

        It’s a study by a US university about China, cited in an article about China by the Guardian. I knew I was going to find something like that before even opening the link. One would hope that after Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan, the Guardian would no longer have any credibility re China in this community.

        China is 1.8 billion people. It’s moving slowly on progressive issues, but it’s moving forward. What it’s not doing is following the West’s example, where it rushes forward on progressive issues at the behest of half the population and then rolls back again next election cycle, letting capitalists commodify progressive virtue, letting the political classes use it as a wedge to divide and rule, and causing the slower half of the population to drag the country into fascism every now and then.

        • Sodium_nitride
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          26 days ago

          Damn, I had no idea that the sampling bias was that bad. I mean, this is a pathetic error.

        • -6-6-6-
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          There is a certain irony about them not having gone to Xinjiang for more “rural answers”. I wonder why. (wondering if they’re banned now for their bullshit lmao)