• Kirbywithwhip1987
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Oh, yes it’s the same thing as Kobe. So nothing then for now.

    But what about other 2 helicopters which were flying alongside, how did they not crash?

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      But what about other 2 helicopters which were flying alongside, how did they not crash?

      Probably had more experience with flying by instruments only, or they were just being more cautious.

      With rotary aircraft, instrument experience varies a lot more from pilot to pilot than fixed wing, that and fixed wing aircraft have a lot more altitude to cushion any mistakes of an inexperienced pilot.

      • Kirbywithwhip1987
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah makes sense, but weird that they put the president in less experienced one.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          If I was a betting guy, I would guess the pilot was current/former revolutionary guard. Military pilots may have more flight time/experience, but they probably don’t spend a lot of it in low vis conditions. Not a lot of reason to have military helicopters operate in conditions where they wouldn’t be able to see targets on the ground.

          Most of these accidents happen just like it did with Kobe. Where the pilots tell their passengers that it’s too dangerous to operate, and the passengers insist they need to get where they’re going anyways.